africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2002] UGSC 30Uganda

Atyam Patrick and Anor v Uganda [2002] UGSC 30 (16 July 2002)

Supreme Court of Uganda

Judgment

# Atyam Patrick and Anor v Uganda [2002] UGSC 30 (16 July 2002) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Atyam+Patrick+and+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2002%5D+UGSC+30+%2816+July+2002%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2002%2F30%2Feng%402002-07-16) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Atyam+Patrick+and+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2002%5D+UGSC+30+%2816+July+2002%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2002%2F30%2Feng%402002-07-16) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Atyam%20Patrick%20and%20Anor%20v%20Uganda%20\[2002\]%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16) __Save [ Download RTF (13.5 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16/source.pdf) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download RTF (13.5 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16/source) * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2002/30/eng@2002-07-16/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Atyam Patrick and Anor v Uganda [2002] UGSC 30 (16 July 2002) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Atyam Patrick and Anor v Uganda [2002] UGSC 30 (16 July 2002) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2002] UGSC 30 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judgment date 16 July 2002 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence Read full summary ###### Case summary The court observed there was sufficient evidence to show that the witness was in a position to positively identify the attackers of the deceased and the witness himself. The appeal was thereby dismissed. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA** **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT MENGO** **CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.****1****OF****2001** **BETWEEN** **ATYAM PATRICK ]………………………………………………………………………..** **BABU SAMUEL ] APPELLANTS** **AND** **UGANDA RESPONDENT** **CORAM: TSEKOOKO, KAROKORA, MULENGA, KANYEIHAMBA AND KATO; JSC.** _**[Appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal at Kampala,(Mpagi- Bahigeine, G.M. Okello, and M.P. Twinomujuni, J.J.A.) dated**_ _**2**_ _**February,**__**2001]**_ _JUDGMENT_ The Appellants were tried for and convicted by the High Court of murder of one Omara. Their appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. They appealed to this court on only one ground, namely that the key witness, Ebong Moses (P.W.I) could not have identified the attackers' of the deceased. We have studied the record. We have considered submissions of Ms Musoke, counsel for Appellants, and those of M. Elubu, Principal State Attorney. In our view there was sufficient evidence to show that P.W.I was in a position to positively identify the attackers of the deceased and the witness himself. We find no merit in the appeal. The same is dismissed. Dated this 16th day of July, 2002. J.W.N. Tsekooko **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** A.N. Karokora **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** A.N. Mulenga **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** G.W. Kanyeihamba **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** C.M. Kato **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >

Similar Cases

Otule Ateker Charles and Anor v Uganda [2005] UGSC 5 (2 March 2005)
[2005] UGSC 5Supreme Court of Uganda85% similar
Kwijuka & anor v Uganda [2004] UGSC 41 (1 September 2004)
[2004] UGSC 41Supreme Court of Uganda85% similar
Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013)
[2013] UGSC 6Supreme Court of Uganda84% similar
Ambaa Jacob & Anor v Uganda [2012] UGSC 1 (16 May 2012)
[2012] UGSC 1Supreme Court of Uganda83% similar
Okiror Leo and Anor v Uganda [2006] UGSC 20 (25 October 2006)
[2006] UGSC 20Supreme Court of Uganda83% similar

Discussion