Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 401South Africa
Howell v Road Accident Fund (2019/28805) [2025] ZAGPJHC 401 (23 April 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
23 April 2025
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPJHC 401
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Howell v Road Accident Fund (2019/28805) [2025] ZAGPJHC 401 (23 April 2025)
Howell v Road Accident Fund (2019/28805) [2025] ZAGPJHC 401 (23 April 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_401.html
sino date 23 April 2025
###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 2019/28805
1.
Reportable: No
2.
Of interest to other judges: No
3.
Revised
23
APRIL 2025
WRIGHT
J
HOWELL, HERBERT JAMES
KNOCKIES
Applicant
and
ROAD ACCIDENT
FUND
Respondent
JUDGMENT
WRIGHT J
1.
In this trial in which the plaintiff, Mr
Howell claims damages from the RAF arising out of an alleged motor
bike accident in 2017,
Mr A Louw who appears for Mr Howell, asks that
the trial proceed.
2.
It would appear that there is agreement
that the question of the merits be separated from that of quantum.
3.
The RAF denies liability.
4.
The matter was set down for trial starting
yesterday, 22 April 2025. The matter was allocated to me yesterday
afternoon and I was
able to proceed today, over Teams, at 12 noon. Mr
Madesele for the RAF had requested that I start today at 12 noon.
There is some
dispute between Mr Louw and Mr Madesele as to precisely
who is to blame for the matter not proceeding earlier today than 12
noon.
5.
The matter is not ripe for trial.
6.
The RAF has not discovered and this morning
it uploaded to caselines various documents, some of which are barely
legible.
7.
The newly uploaded documents include a copy
of the police docket and include an apparent statement by Mr Howell
to the police made
in 2018 in which Mr Howell allegedly said that he
remembered nothing of the accident.
8.
Mr Louw indicated that he would call Mr
Howell and possibly two other witnesses on the merits.
9.
Mr Madesele indicated that he would seek to
cross-examine Mr Howell on his alleged statement to the police in
2018.
10.
During the course of debate, Mr Louw agreed
that Mr Howell had made an affidavit dated 19 March 2018, at
caselines 19-101 to 19-102,
which is accurate and made freely and
voluntarily. This affidavit, it was agreed by Mr Louw, could be used
by Mr Madesele in cross-examining
Mr Howell.
11.
However, the alleged statement by Mr Howell
to the police in 2018 would be the subject of a trial within a trial.
Mr Madesele would
not be allowed to cross-examine Mr Howell on this
statement until its admissibility is proved. This is because Mr Louw
disputed
the admissibility of the 2018 statement.
12.
Regarding costs, it appears, and I put it
no higher than that, that Mr Howell in fact made a statement to the
police in 2018. He
has not discovered this statement.
13.
Costs should be reserved. In due course the
truth about the 2018 statement will hopefully be revealed. It is then
that a proper
finding about all the possible causes for the matter
not proceeding today can be made.
14.
Mr Madesele agreed to a suggestion by Mr
Louw that the RAF discover by 5 May 2025 and that failing such
discovery Mr Howell could
apply for the striking of the defence and
the entering of judgment.
ORDER
1.
The matter is removed from the roll.
2.
Costs reserved.
3.
The defendant is to discover by 4pm on 5
May 2025, failing which the plaintiff may apply for the striking of
the defence and the
entering of judgment in favour of the plaintiff.
GC
Wright
Judge
of the High Court
Gauteng
Division, Johannesburg
HEARD:
23 April 2025
DELIVERED:
23 April 2025
APPEARANCES
:
Plaintiff
Adv
A Louw
antonlouw@law.co.za
Instructed
by
Potgieter
R Attorneys
rudolph@potgieterattorneys.co.za
Defendant
Att M Madesele
matimuma@raf.co.za
Instructed
by Road Accident Fund
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Howell v Freese (11341/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 458 (11 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 458High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Howe v Platform 45 (Pty) Ltd (13158/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 409 (29 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 409High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
F.H.M v Road Accident Fund (2023/071933) [2025] ZAGPJHC 398 (17 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 398High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
S.A.H v S.B.H (2025/095199) [2025] ZAGPJHC 760 (23 July 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 760High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
M.H v S.S.H (Appeal) (A2025/055489) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1164 (6 November 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1164High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar