africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2024] ZAGPJHC 246South Africa

D.D v L.M (A2023/69927) [2024] ZAGPJHC 246 (7 March 2024)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
7 March 2024
WRIGHT J, TWALA J, Wright J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPJHC 246 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## D.D v L.M (A2023/69927) [2024] ZAGPJHC 246 (7 March 2024) D.D v L.M (A2023/69927) [2024] ZAGPJHC 246 (7 March 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2024_246.html sino date 7 March 2024 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER : A2023-69927 1. Reportable:   No 2. Of interest to other judges:  No 3. Revised Wright J 7 March 2024 In the matter between: D[...] D[...]                                                                                   Appellant And L[...] J[...] M[...]                                                                           Respondent CIVIL APPEAL - JUDGMENT WRIGHT J [1] The appellant is the father of a girl who is now eight years old. The respondent is the mother. The parties never married each other. The appellant is married and he supports his wife, mother, sister and a young child. The appellant is a doctor. [2] The appellant seeks to amend his grounds of appeal as per a notice dated 1 November 2023. The respondent objects by notice. She does so mainly on the grounds of lack of particularity.  In my view, the amendment should be granted in the interests of allowing the matter fully to be ventilated. [3] The respondent is unemployed. She worked for Mango Airlines but was retrenched in October 2021. She received a package of R185 000 but has only R20 000 left. The respondent lives with her parents. [4] The respondent applied for and obtained a maintenance order in the Magistrate’s Court in Daveyton. This related only to her child. After an inquiry at which the parties testified, the Magistrate ordered the appellant to pay R5 000 pm for the child as well as R1 000 pm towards medical aid. The appellant was ordered to pay the school fees for the child and R4 000 per year for clothing. [5] The appellant has a successful medical practice. In the year to 2022 he made a nett R4.45 million. The appellant lives an expensive lifestyle. The appellant says that he runs his medical practice through a company of which he is sole director. He says that this separating of his business from his personal life and accounts should be relevant to his alleged inability to pay maintenance. This is wrong in law. How the appellant arranges his finances has nothing to do with his duty to pay for his child according to her needs and his ability. [6] The appeal is wholly without merit. [7] At this hearing, there was no appearance for the respondent. Accordingly, each side shall carry their own costs. ORDER 1. The grounds of appeal are amended as per the appellant’s notice dated 1 November 2023. 2. Relating to the amendment, the parties are to pay their own costs. 3. The appeal is dismissed. 4. Each side to pay their own costs in the appeal. WRIGHT J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG I agree TWALA J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Heard on:                       7 March 2024 Delivered on:                  7 March 2024 Appearances: For the Appellant:            Adv A Bleki ableki@rsabar.com 076 482 3869 Instructed by:                  L Gcolotela Inc info@lgcolotelainc.co.za 078 058 2699 For the Respondent:       No appearance Instructed by:                  NKONYANE ATTORNEYS INC makhosazane@nkonyane.co.za lethabo@nkonyane.co.za 010 007 5228 sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

D.L.H v A.D.H and Another (2014/11667) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1282 (13 December 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 1282High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.L v D.J (2024/088101) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1210 (15 October 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 1210High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
L.D.B v J.S.B (A3079/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 786 (13 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 786High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
L.B v D.F.B (013221/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1441 (8 December 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1441High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
D.A v D.T.M (2021/23816) [2024] ZAGPJHC 416 (26 April 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 416High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar

Discussion