Mokhulane Security Services (Pty) Ltd and Others v Mukund and Another (23823/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 714 (7 August 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPJHC 714 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Mokhulane Security Services (Pty) Ltd and Others v Mukund and Another (23823/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 714 (7 August 2024) Mokhulane Security Services (Pty) Ltd and Others v Mukund and Another (23823/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 714 (7 August 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2024_714.html sino date 7 August 2024 ###### SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy ###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 23823/2022 1. Reportable:  No 2. Of interest to other judges: No 3. Revised: 7 August 2024 In the matter between: MOKHULANE SECURITY SERVICES (PTY) LTD First Applicant (Registration Number: 2015/272533/07) SYLVESTER AYUK TAKU                                                  Second Applicant (Identity Number: 7[…]) BASETSANA WINNY TAKU                                               Third Applicant (Identity Number: 8[…]) and VEENA ASHUTOSH MUKUND JOG First Respondent ASHUTOSH MUKUND JOG                                              Second Respondent JUDGMENT – APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL WRIGHT J 1. According to their notice of motion dated 20 June 2023, the three named applicants, not just two of them, sought condonation for “ the Applicants’ late filing of their application for rescission of judgment . “ What was also sought was rescission of a certain judgment and related relief. 2. On 4 June 2024, in a typed, signed judgment, I dismissed the application for want of a case made out on the question of condonation. 3. The same three cited applicants, not just two of them, now seek leave to appeal my order. 4. In my view, the applicants have no reasonable prospect on appeal and there is no compelling reason to grant leave. ORDER 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. The applicants are jointly and severally to pay the costs of the respondents. GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD: 7 August 2024 DELIVERED: 7 August 2024 APPEARANCES    : Applicants Adv T Paige-Green 012 947 9428 / 079 523 4963 tpaigergr@clubadvocates.co.za Instructed by Mudenda Inc 011 675 0343 Tendayi@Mudendainc.co.za Respondents Adv M A Kruger 082 467 3089 meltkruger@me.com Instructed by Marshall Attorneys 011 787 4027 sean@marshallattorneys.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start