Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 28South Africa
Dlodlo v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another (16306/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 28 (19 January 2023)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
19 January 2023
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPJHC 28
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Dlodlo v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another (16306/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 28 (19 January 2023)
Dlodlo v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another (16306/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 28 (19 January 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_28.html
sino date 19 January 2023
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO:
16306/2022
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED
19
JANUARY 2023
In
the matter between:
MOLEFE
RUFARO MTHULISI DLODLO
Appellant
and
THE
MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND
CONSTITUTIONAL
DEVELOPMENT 1st
Respondent
THE
RULES BOARD FOR COURTS OF LAW
2
nd
Respondent
Coram:
Dlamini J
Date
of hearing: 24 November 2022 – in a ‘virtual Hearing’
during a videoconference on Microsoft Teams digital
platform.
Date
of delivery of reasons: 19 January 2022
This
judgment is deemed to have been delivered electronically by
circulation to the parties’ representatives via email and
shall
be uploaded onto the caselines system.
JUDGMENT
DLAMINI
J
[1]
This an application for leave to appeal my judgment that I handed
down on 19 October
2022.
[2]
It is common cause that when the matter came before me, the parties
agreed that only
the point
in limine
of res judica
should be argued as this will the effect of disposing the matter
without dealing with the merits thereof.
[3]
The numb of the issue was whether Judge Motojane had already made a
ruling dismissing
a similar application seeking the same ordes
against the same parties under case number 2018/ 16715. Justice
Matojane dismissed
this application with a punitive costs order.
Instead of appealing Matojane J’s order, the applicant brought
the same application
before me under a different case number.
[4]
It is trite that for an application for leave to appeal to be
successful it is required
of the parties seeking such leave to
demonstrate that there are reasonable prospects that another Court
will come to a different
conclusion to that reached in the judgment
that is sought to be taken on appeal.
[5]
The provisions of section 17 of the Supreme Court Act has now
elevated the test to
be applied for granting of leave to appeal. The
use of the word “would” when considering the prospects of
success in
section 17 (1)(a)(i) , now imposes a more stringent and
vigorous threshold.
[6]
I have read the heads of argument and heard and submissions
both parties .
[7]
It is my considered view there is no ambiguity in Motojane J’s
judgment
,unless it is reviewed, appealed and set aside, the judgment
remains valid and should be followed. It is therefore
impermissilble
for the applicant, to enroll the same application
under a different case number instead of appealing Matojane’s
order.
For
all the reasons stated above and in my judgment, I make the following
order:
ORDER
The
application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs
DLAMINI
J
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
Date
of hearing: 24
November 2022
Delivered:
19
January 2023
For
the Applicants: Adv
AJ Venter
Email:
ajventer@law.co.za
Instructed
by:
Martins
Weir-Smith
For
theRespondent
:
SG
Dos Santos
Email:
suzydsantos@gmail.com
Instructed
by:
James
Bush
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Dlodlo v Minster of Justice and Constitutional Development and Another (16306/2022) [2022] ZAGPJHC 807 (19 October 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 807High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Dlodlo v Acting Chairperson Judicial Conduct Committee and Others (111031/24) [2025] ZAGPJHC 846 (21 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 846High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Dlodlo v Acting Chairperson Judicial Conduct Committee and Others (111031/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1018 (6 October 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1018High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Dladla v Ndhlovu and Others (2022-13299) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1019 (11 September 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1019High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Dladla and Others v CNG Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (37732/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 816 (18 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 816High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar