Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 1019South Africa
Dladla v Ndhlovu and Others (2022-13299) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1019 (11 September 2023)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
11 September 2023
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1019
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Dladla v Ndhlovu and Others (2022-13299) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1019 (11 September 2023)
Dladla v Ndhlovu and Others (2022-13299) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1019 (11 September 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_1019.html
sino date 11 September 2023
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO:
2022-13299
NOT REPORTABLE
NOT OF INTEREST TO
OTHER JUDGES
REVISED
11/09/23
In the matter between:
GAWULAPHI
DLADLA
APPLICANT
And
MABEL
PHINDILE NDHLOVU
FIRST
RESPONDENT
THE
MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS
SECOND
RESPONDENT
THE
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS
THIRD
RESPONDENT
THE
MASTER OF SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT
FORTH
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
WRIGHT J
1.
On 21 May 2021, as part of the unopposed motion
roll, I granted an order in favour of the present first respondent,
Ms Ndlovu. The
order declared that Ms Ndlovu had been married by
custom to the late Mr Madondo. The order provided for the Master of
the High
Court to issue letters of executorship to Ms Ndlovu in the
deceased estate of Mr Madondo.
2.
The present applicant, Ms Dladla seeks now
rescission of my earlier order. She says that she was married by
custom to Mr Madondo
in 1974, well before Ms Ndlovu and Mr Madondo
purportedly got married. Ms Dladla says that she never consented to
the customary
marriage between Ms Ndlovu and Mr Madondo and therefor
any marriage between them is invalid. What appear to be at stake are
the
rights of Ms Dladla and Ms Ndlovu to inherit from Mr Madondo.
3.
Ms Dladla says that the first time she learnt of
my order was on 10 December 2021, some seven months after it had been
granted.
She points out that she was not cited in the application
before me.
4.
The present application was launched some four or
five month’s after Ms Dladla found out about my order. She
explains that
she did not have funds to approach a lawyer in time. In
my view, this explanation is reasonable and there is no prejudice to
the
respondents.
5.
Ms Dladla sets out a case in her founding
affidavit regarding her marriage in 1974 to Mr Madondo. The answering
affidavit of Ms
Ndlovu raises huge disputes of fact. The replying
affidavit contains factual allegations and evidence which should have
been placed
in founding affidavit.
6.
These disputes of fact cannot be adjudicated on
paper.
7.
Ms Dladla has no legal standing to rescind the
earlier order and no right to participate in the estate of Mr Madondo
unless she
proves her marriage to Mr Madondo. In these circumstances,
she is at this stage entitled to condonation for the late bringing of
the present application but the matter needs to go to trial.
8.
Had I known of the fact that Ms Dladla had an
interest in the matter, if in fact she has such interest, I would not
have granted
the order sought now to be rescinded and Ms Dladla would
be entitled to request a rescission of my order. Because her standing
is of cardinal importance to her application, the matter needs a
trial.
ORDER
1.
The applicant is granted for condonation for the
lateness of the application.
2.
The notice of motion stands as a simple summons.
3.
The notice of intention to oppose stands as a
notice of intention to defend.
4.
The applicant is to deliver a declaration by 30
September 2023.
5.
Thereafter, the matter proceeds as a trial
action.
6.
Costs reserved.
GC Wright
Judge of the High
Court
Gauteng Division,
Johannesburg
HEARD : 11
September 2023
DELIVERED : 11 September
2023
APPEARANCES
:
APPLICANT
Adv Nhlakanipho Edward
Mbhele
071 154 2966
nzacalaw@gmail.com
Instructed by
Nzaca Attorneys
011 860 0285
1
st
RESPONDENT
Att Tafara Mukwani
074 631 1482
tafara@mukwaniattorney.co.za
Instructed by
T. Mukwani Attorneys
011 331 0072 /
074 631 1482
tafara@mukwaniattorneys.co.za
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Dladla and Others v CNG Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (37732/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 816 (18 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 816High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Dlodlo v Acting Chairperson Judicial Conduct Committee and Others (111031/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1018 (6 October 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1018High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Ndlozi v Media 24 t/a Daily Sun and Others (21/25599) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1040; 2024 (1) SA 215 (GJ); [2024] 1 All SA 392 (GJ) (19 September 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1040High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Letlalo and Others v Malapile and Another (33916/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 593 (30 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 593High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
L. D. v M[...] P[...] I[...] (Pty) Ltd and Another (A132469/2023; A133154/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 193 (26 February 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 193High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar