Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 839South Africa
J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
27 July 2023
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPJHC 839
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023)
J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_839.html
sino date 27 July 2023
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE NO
: A24/2022
DATE
: 2022-08-08
NOT REPORTABLE
NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES
REVISED
27.07.23
In
the matter between
B,
J
And
STATE
Defendant
J U D G M E N T
YACOOB,
J
: This matter comes
before us on automatic appeal. The appellant appeals on sentence
only.
It was submitted that the sentence
lacks proportionality because of the appellant’s circumstances.
The appellant is a young
man with a history of having been abused.
However, we are satisfied that the Court below exercised its
discretion judiciously.
Against the circumstances of the appellant,
including the abuse he suffered as a child and his relative youth,
must be balanced
the fact that he showed no remorse or even any
evidence that he was perturbed for what he had done, as well as the
fact that he
knew he was HIV positive, and has now visited this HIV
sentence on his two young victims; the fact that his victims were
also younger
than he was, and they also had a troubled background.
When all these factors balance against
his own circumstances, we are both satisfied that magistrate
exercised his discretion judiciously
and therefore the appeal is
dismissed.
BHOOLA, AJ:
I agree.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
YACOOB, J
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
DATE
:
27 July 2023
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
J.J.A v A.A (2022/021236) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1045 (15 September 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1045High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.K.N v P.Z (012791/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 798 (15 June 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 798High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
M.B v J.P.M (49323/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 449 (9 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 449High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
S.M v J.M and Another (2022/218731) [2023] ZAGPJHC 704 (13 June 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 704High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.B v T.D.S (2025/112007) [2025] ZAGPJHC 815 (18 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 815High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar