africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 839South Africa

J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
27 July 2023
OTHER J, LawCite J, Defendant J, us on automatic appeal. The appellant appeals on sentence

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023) J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_839.html sino date 27 July 2023 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO :  A24/2022 DATE : 2022-08-08 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED 27.07.23 In the matter between B, J And STATE Defendant J U D G M E N T YACOOB, J :  This matter comes before us on automatic appeal. The appellant appeals on sentence only. It was submitted that the sentence lacks proportionality because of the appellant’s circumstances. The appellant is a young man with a history of having been abused. However, we are satisfied that the Court below exercised its discretion judiciously. Against the circumstances of the appellant, including the abuse he suffered as a child and his relative youth, must be balanced the fact that he showed no remorse or even any evidence that he was perturbed for what he had done, as well as the fact that he knew he was HIV positive, and has now visited this HIV sentence on his two young victims; the fact that his victims were also younger than he was, and they also had a troubled background. When all these factors balance against his own circumstances, we are both satisfied that magistrate exercised his discretion judiciously and therefore the appeal is dismissed. BHOOLA, AJ: I agree. - - - - - - - - - - - - YACOOB, J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT DATE : 27 July 2023 sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

J.J.A v A.A (2022/021236) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1045 (15 September 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1045High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.K.N v P.Z (012791/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 798 (15 June 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 798High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
M.B v J.P.M (49323/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 449 (9 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 449High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
S.M v J.M and Another (2022/218731) [2023] ZAGPJHC 704 (13 June 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 704High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.B v T.D.S (2025/112007) [2025] ZAGPJHC 815 (18 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 815High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar

Discussion