Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 815South Africa
J.B v T.D.S (2025/112007) [2025] ZAGPJHC 815 (18 August 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
18 August 2025
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPJHC 815
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## J.B v T.D.S (2025/112007) [2025] ZAGPJHC 815 (18 August 2025)
J.B v T.D.S (2025/112007) [2025] ZAGPJHC 815 (18 August 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_815.html
sino date 18 August 2025
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG LOCAL
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE NO: 2025-112007
(1)
REPORTABLE: YES/NO
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
(3)
REVISED:
18
August 2025
In the matter between:
J[…]
B[…]
Applicant
and
T[...]
D[...] S[...]
Respondent
JUDGMENT
SEGAL AJ:
[1]
This is an application
which came before court during the week of 29 July 2025 in which the
Applicant (the mother) sought an urgent
order interdicting the
Respondent (the father) from relocating with the two minor children,
M[...] M[...] S[…] (“
M[...]
”),
aged 16 and C[...]S[…] (“
C[…]
”),
aged 9
from relocating with
the father to Cape Town pending the finalisation of Part B of the
application. I will refer to the parties
as the mother and the
father, respectively.
[2]
In addition, in Part A,
the mother sought confirmation of the appointment of social worker,
Sarie Nell to conduct an investigation
and provide a report
regarding:-
2.1
whether the intended
relocation is in the children’s best interests;
2.2
whether the children
immediately be placed in a structured home-schooling institution to
receive appropriate academic guidance and
consistent educational
support;
2.3
the return of the
children to the mother’s primary care subject to the father’s
defined rights of contact;
2.4
the immediate
therapeutic intervention for both children including reconstructive
and bonding therapy between the children and their
mother;
2.5
the mother submitting
herself to regular drug and alcohol testing
to
be conducted upon request by the Parenting Coordinator
;
[3]
The father opposed the
application and counter applied for an order in Part A that:-
3.1
primary residence of the children vest with him;
3.2
that the mother be granted supervised physical contact with C[…],
which contact is to be supervised by a registered social
worker on
alternate weekends on a Saturday and Sunday, for a period of six
hours per contact session;
3.3
that the mother shall not have any contact with M[...] unless M[...]
specifically requests such contact; and
3.4
that the mother pays the costs of the application.
[4]
At the hearing of the matter, I indicated to the
parties that:-
4.1
I considered the matter to be urgent; and
4.2
the father would not be permitted to relocate with the children at
this stage.
[5]
When the matter stood down, it was arranged that
M[...] would attend an urgent appointment with a psychiatrist in the
week following
the hearing of the matter in light of the findings of
Dr Del Fabbro. The father indicated that he would secure alternative
accommodation
in Gauteng and undertook not to relocate with the
children until a court permitted him to do so. The mother was
represented by
attorneys and counsel. The father was unrepresented
and appeared in person.
[6]
Upon reading the papers
it appeared that not only is this application indeed urgent, but it
is in fact one which gives cause for
alarm.
[7]
The mother, who resides
in Henley on Klip, was the children’s primary caregiver until 5
February 2025, when a disagreement
arose between the mother and
M[...], which regrettably escalated into a physical altercation (“
the
incident
”) at
the mother’s home, which resulted in the children telephoning
their father to come and collect them immediately
and remove them
from their mother’s home to his home late one night.
[8]
There is a dispute
about what occurred on that night. The mother contends that the
incident was occasioned because M[...] had a
tantrum and shouted at
her, that M[...] often displays unruly behaviour when reprimanded and
that the mother in frustration swung
her arm at the wall, which
resulted in her arm making contact with the mirror in M[...]’s
room and causing it to break.
[9]
The mother’s
erstwhile partner J[...] M
[…]
T[…] (“
J[...]
”)
was present at the home at the time
of the incident. It appears that he and the mother have since
terminated their relationship
and that the mother now lives alone.
The mother contends that the main problem in her relationship with
M[...] is that M[...] is
being coached by her father, who allegedly
actively discourages M[...] from having a relationship with her.
[10]
The father’s
version is quite different. He contends that on the 5
th
of February 2025, M[...] contacted him in a state of distress and
asked him to “
help
[her] and to come now
”.
The children texted that they were “
so
scared”
and
asked their father to “
please
hurry
” but at
the same time, feared that if the father entered their home J[...]
would become so angry that he would shoot him.
This incident was
extremely traumatic for the children.
[11]
The father contacted
the SAPS, contending
inter
alia
that M[...]
was physically assaulted by the mother, that M[...] had “
blood
splatters on her shoes and clothing
”,
and that J[...] had threatened both children. This troubling incident
resulted in the father removing the children from
the mother’s
primary care and having them reside primarily with him since this
date.
[12]
Photographs of the
aftermath of the incident are disturbing and reflect
inter
alia
a broken
mirror, a microwave on the bedroom floor and other kitchen items
lying on the floor in M[...]’s bedroom. It is common
cause that
the mother drove herself to the hospital on account of her injuries
and profuse bleeding which required immediate medical
attention.
WhatsApp messages were attached to the papers to corroborate the
ongoings on the night of the incident.
[13]
The father contends
that the mother suffers with mental health challenges, that she has
attempted suicide and has attended numerous
rehabilitation clinics
for drug and alcohol dependency. The father contends that the mother
has been “mentally unstable”
for the past 2 years.
[14]
Until eighteen months
ago, it seems that the parties shared a reasonably amicable
relationship; they would liaise with one another
to make arrangements
for the children where necessary, and the mother would assist the
father financially from time to time. This
relationship apparently
began to deteriorate eighteen months ago when it is alleged that the
mother and J[...] began drinking alcohol
excessively.
[15]
The father also
contends that the children were neglected and left to their own
devices mostly unattended. There are other concerning
allegations
about substance abuse in the mother’s home which regrettably
involve M[...]. There were allegedly physical fights
between the
mother and J[...] in the presence of the children and other serious
concerns about the mother’s parenting. Allegations
of sexual
abuse / inappropriateness on the part of J[...] against M[...] were
also made.
[16]
Although the mother
seeks an order that social worker, Sarie Nell (“
Ms
Nell
”) be
appointed to conduct an investigation as part of the order sought in
Part A, it appears that by agreement between the
parties Ms Nell had
completed a forensic investigation and rendered her report which
became available shortly before the matter
was to be heard.
[17]
Ms Nell recommends
inter alia
that:-
“
21.1
…the parties be jointly granted full parental responsibilities
and rights as contemplated in Section 18(2)(a)
of the Children’s
Act 38 of 2005 regarding the minor child (sic).
21.2
Parental responsibilities and rights regarding guardianship as
stipulated in Section 18(2)()c) and 18(3)
of the minor child (sic)
shall be awarded to both parties.
21.3
Primary
residence
of the minor child (sic) shall be awarded to the mother.
21.4
The contact rights of the father are as follow:
a)
Weekly contact
starting on a Friday afternoon until the following Friday morning
which alternates between parents.
b)
First right of
refusal be implemented as stated in previous section of the report.
c)
Telephonic
contact daily which are convenient for both parents.
d)
That the short
and long holidays be divided between the parents with the following
pre-requisites:
e)
That the other
parent will have daily telephonic with the child/children.
21.5
The mother not have any contact with her previous partner.
21.6
The parent who cares for the child (sic) provides an address to the
other parent for notification.
21.7
The appointment of a Parental Coordinator to manage contact, ensure
the children attend suitable therapy,
and verify that the mother
complies with regular or random alcohol and drug testing for 2 years.
21.8
M[...] needs to be evaluated by a Psychiatrist, and the mother needs
to adhere to the recommendations of
the psychiatrist.
21.9
M[...] and C[...]need to attend a therapeutic intervention with a
clinical psychologist.
21.10 The mother
needs to attend parental guidance with a clinical psychologist...”
[18]
The recommendations in
21.3 and 21.4 are in conflict with one another. There are repeated
references to “the child”
and it is unclear which child
is referred to or whether there is a typographical error and this
should read “the children”.
[19]
As part of Ms Nell’s
report, a forensic psychologist Dr Del Fabbro (“
Dr
Del Fabbro
”)
conducted an investigation in respect of M[...]. Dr Del Fabbro
recorded
inter alia
that M[...] reported:-
19.1 a
history of domestic violence and alcohol abuse in the home of the
mother;
19.2
that the mother regularly threatened and tried to commit suicide;
19.3 that the
mother has a history of self-harming;
19.4 that the
mother has admitted to various rehabilitation facilities for alcohol
abuse and psychiatric issues;
19.5
being attacked by the mother with a broken piece of mirror,
inflicting profound psychological trauma on M[...];
19.6
grappling with the traumatic legacy of the mother’s violence;
19.7
being happy in her current environment, with the father, however she
had some reservations about certain
accommodation matters and
struggles with the father’s supervision;
18.9
she had consumed substances with the mother (alcohol, psychedelic
narcotics and marijuana) under the mother’s
pressure and
encouragement.
[20]
Dr Del Fabbro opined
that-:
20.1
M[...] has become
desensitised to the mother’s behaviour, being a significant
concern for Dr Del Fabbro;
20.2
M[...] is ambivalent to
seeing the mother and suffers from cognitive dissonance;
20.3
M[...] is currently
grappling with the severe, pervasive and cumulative effects of
chronic complex trauma, primarily stemming from
prolonged exposure to
domestic violence, the mother’s severe alcohol abuse and direct
physical assault.
[21]
Del Fabbro concludes
and recommends that:-
“
..
to
address M[...]’s identified risks and promote her psychological
well-being:
1.
Imm
e
di
a
te
Safety
Plannin
g
and
Crisis
Intervention
:
Given
M[...]'s current moderate to
high
risk
for
se
l
f
-
harm
and suicidal
ideation,
particularly
in
light
of
the
impending
relocation,
immediate
and
proact
iv
e
safety measures are
paramount.
•
Urgent
Referral for Psychiatric Evaluation:
An
urgent
referral to
a
child and adolescent psychiatrist
is
recommended
for a comprehensive evaluation
,
particu
l
arly
concerning
her
severe
depressive symptoms and
persistent
suicidal
ideation.
This
evaluation
should
include
consideration
of
psychotropic
m
e
dication
if
clinically
indicated
to
stabilize
her
mood
and reduce
the intensity
of suicidal
thoughts.
•
Comprehensive
Safety
Plan Development:
A
detailed, collaborative safety plan must be deve
l
oped
with M[...],
her
father,
and stepmother. This
plan
should
include:
o
Identification
of Triggers:
Clearly
identify specific triggers for
M[...]
'
s
distress, self
-
harm
urges,
or
suicidal
ideation (e.g.,
feelings
of failure,
perceived
rejection, arguments, lack of privacy,
loss
of
social
connections, discuss
i
ons
about her
mother's
past
behaviour,
the
impending
move).
o
Coping
Strategies:
Outline
a tiered
list
of
adaptive
coping
strategies
M[...]
can
employ
when
experiencing
distress or urges, ranging
from self
soothing
techniques
(e.g.,
listening
to music,
talking
to her
boyfriend/sister, engaging
in
band activities)
to
more
structured
distress tolerance
sk
ill
s
(which will
be
taught
in
therapy).
o
Emergency
Contacts:
Provide
clear emergency
contact
numbers, includin
g
crisis
hotlines
,
the
soc
i
al
worker,
her
father,
and
stepmother.
o
Crisis
Protocol:
Delineate
a clear
step-by-step
protocol for
M[...]
and her
family to follow
i
n
a crisis,
including
when
to
contact
her
father/stepmother,
when
to
seek
immediate
professional
help (e.g.,
c
ontacting
emergency
services
or
psychiatric
crisis teams), and
how
the family
will
support
her through
overwhelming urges.
•
Strict
Environmental Safety
Measures:
To reduce
access
to
means
of
self
harm
or suicide,
it is
imperative to
implement
strict
environmental safety measures
within
the home:
o
Medications:
All
prescription
and over-the-counter
medications
must
be
stored securely,
under
lock and
key,
and
administered by
her
father
or
stepmother
.
o
Sharp
Objects:
All
sharp objects
(e
.
g.,
razors, knives, scissors) should be secured
or
their
access
strictly
limited
and
monitored.
o
Alcohol/Drugs:
All
alcohol and
recreational
drugs
must be
completely removed from the household,
with
no
exceptions, given
M[...]'s
prior
exposure
and
vulnerability.
2.
Therapeutic
Int
erve
ntions
for
M[...]
:
Intensive
and
multi
-
modal
thera
peutic
interventions
are
crucial
to
address the
root causes of M[...]'s
risks
and build
her
long
-
term
resilience.
•
Intensive
Individual Therapy:
M[...]
requires
ongoing,
intensive
individual
therapy
(init
ia
lly
2-3 times per
week,
reducing
frequency as stability
improves)
with
a
clinician
specializing
in
adolescent
trauma
.
The
therapeutic
focus
should
include:
o
Trauma
Processing:
Utili
zi
ng
evidence-based
modalities
such as
Trauma
-F
ocused
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
(TF-CBT)
or
Eye
Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing
(EMDR)
to
help
M[...]
process
the traumatic
memories
and
experiences related to her mother's
violence
and substance
abuse.
o
Emotion
Regulation Skills:
Tea
ching
and
practicing
Dialectical Behaviour
Therapy
(DBT)
skills,
particularly
mindfulness
,
distress tolerance,
and
emotion
regulation,
to
help
M[...]
identify,
understand, and
manage
intense
emotional
states
without
resorting
to
self-harm
or
other
maladaptive coping.
o
Coping
with Urges:
Developing
specific strategies for coping
with
urges for
self
-
harm
and substance
use,
including
urge surfing,
distraction, and activating alternative,
healthy
behaviours
.
o
Self-Esteem
Building:
Addressing
her internalized
shame,
guilt, and feelings of
worthlessness
to
foster
a healthier
self
-
concept.
o
Attachment
Repair:
Exploring
and addressing her anxious-ambivalent attachment patterns to
help
her
develop
more
secure
and trusting relationships.
•
Substance
Abuse
Interventions:
While
M[...]
denies
current
use,
proactive
interventions are essential:
o
Motivational
Interviewing:
To
reinforce her stated
desire
not to
use
substances
and strengthen
her
commitment to
a substance-free
lifestyle
.
o
Psychoeducation:
Providing
education on the long
-
term
impacts of
parental
substance abuse and the risks of self
-
medication.
o
Relapse
Prevention
Planning:
Proactively
developing
strategies
to
i
dentify
triggers for potential substance
use
and
implement
alternative
coping
mechanisms
.
•
Family
Therapy:
Concurrent
family
therapy
is
strongly
recommended
(initially
weekly, reducing
frequency as
dynamics
improve)
to
:
o
Improve
Communication:
Facilitate
open and
honest
communication
between M[...],
her
father
,
and
stepmother regarding
her
emotional
state, needs, and challenges.
o
Address
Family Dynamics:
Work
through
the
impact of
the
historical
trauma
on
current
family
dynamics,
including
Mr.
S[…]'s
denial of
the
full
extent of
M[...]'s
depression/suicidal
ideation and
the challenges of adjustment to the new home environment.
o
Support System
for
M[...]:
Strengthen
the
family
unit as a consistent and reliable source of support for M[...].
o
Psychoeducation
for Parents:
Educate
both her father and stepmother on the specific manifestations of
trauma, attachment issues, and risk behaviours in in adolescents,
and
how to respond in a supportive and effective manner.
•
Consideration
of Group Therapy:
As
M[...]
establishes
stability in
individual
therapy,
consider
a referral to an adolescent group therapy program focusing on trauma,
self-harm, or emotional regulation. This could
provide
peer support,
reduce feelings of
isolation,
and offer
additional opportunities to practice coping skills.
3.
Parental
Support and Education:
Mr.
S[…] and
his
partner
are
crucial protective factors, and their
understanding
and capacity
to respond to
M[...]'s
needs
are
vital.
•
Comprehensive
Risk Education:
Provide
detailed education
to
both Mr. S[…]
and
his
partner on:
o
Signs
of Self-Harm:
Including
Less
obvious
indicators beyond
visible
injuries.
o
Signs
of Substance Abuse:
Behavioural,
physical, and emotional indicators.
o
Signs
of Suicidal
Ideation:
Specific
verbal
cues,
behavioural changes, and emotional states, addressing
Mr.
Snyman's
current awareness gap.
•
Crisis
Management Training:
Train
them on
how
to respond effectively
during
a crisis
related
to
self-harm
or
suicidal
ideation,
including
de-escalation techniques and activation of the
safety plan.
•
Boundaries
and Supervision:
Support
parents
in
establishing
clear, consistent, and age-appropriate boundaries and supervision
that balance
M[...]'s
need for
safety
with
her
developmental
need
for
privacy
and
autonomy. This should specifically address her struggles
with
the
"smaller
living
environment" and "greater
level
of
supervision."
•
Referral
to Parenting Support:
Recommend
referral to parenting support groups or educational programs
focused
on raising
adolescents
with
trauma
histories or
mental
health
challenges.
4.
School-Based
I
nterventions
:
Given
M[...]'s
current
home
-
schooling,
specific
li
aison
with
lmpaq
is
necessary.
•
Liaison
and
Support
Plan:
Estab
li
sh
direct
communicat
i
on
with
lmpaq
home schoo
l
personne
l
(
e.g.,
designated
admi
n
istrator
or
counsellor,
i
f
available). Implement a schoo
l
-based
support plan that includes:
o
Designated
Safe Person:
Identify
a trusted adult at
l
mpaq
whom M[...] can approach
i
f
she feels overwhelmed or distressed.
o
Academic
Accommodations:
If her
depression, a
n
x
i
ety,
or trauma symptoms
i
mpact
her concentration or academic performance, exp
l
ore
accommodat
i
ons
(e
.
g
.
,
reduced workload, extended deadlines, quiet testing environment
)
.
•
Policy
Awareness:
Ensure
awareness of
l
mpaq's
polic
i
es
and resources regarding menta
l
hea
l
th
support, substance use, and self-harm.
5.
Pharmacological
Review
:
Psychiatric
Evaluation:
As
prev
i
ous
l
y
noted, an
u
rgent
psychiatric
eva
l
uat
i
on
is highly recommended. The psychiatrist will
assess the
need for psychotropic med
i
cation
(
e.g
.
,
antidepressants, anxio
l
yt
i
cs)
to address
underly
i
ng
mental health
conditions
(depression,
anxiety) that contribute s
i
gnificant
l
y
to her overall distress and risk prof
i
le.
Close monitoring of medication
effecti
v
eness
and side effects will be crucial.
6.
Contact
with Mother
:
M[...]'s
ambiva
l
ence
towards
h
er
mother
a
n
d
the
perceived
re
j
ection
are
s
i
gnif
i
cant
stressors that direct
l
y
impact her emot
i
onal
state and risk
l
evels.
•
Highly
Supervised
Contact
Only:
Any
future contact
with Ms. B[…]
should be limited and occur on
l
y
under strict,
therapeutic supervis
i
on.
Unsupervised
contact is strong
l
y
contra
i
ndicated
at this
time
given Ms. B[…]'s denial, historical
violence,
substance abuse, and negat
i
ve
impact on
M[...]
.
•
Therapeutic
Conditions
for
Contact:
If
contact
is
considered
therapeutically
beneficial in the future, the follow
i
ng
conditions are paramount:
o
Mother's
Sobriety:
Ms.
B[…] must demonstrate sustained sobriety and engagement in her
own therapeutic treatment for substance abuse and mental
hea
l
th
issues.
o
No
Discussions of Past Incidents:
Contact
sessions shou
l
d
be carefully fac
i
litated
to avoid discuss
i
ons
of past traumatic
i
ncidents
or the current care arrangements unless explic
i
t
l
y
guided by the therapist.
o
M[...]'s
Readiness:
Contact
shou
l
d
only proceed with
M[...]'s
explicit willingness
a
n
d
when
her
emotional
stability
has
significantly
impro
v
ed,
ensuring
it
does not re
-
traumatize
her or
increase her distress.
o
Focus
on Positive Engagement:
The
focus should be on building positive, healthy interaction, rathe
r
than
addressing past grievances, at least init
i
ally.
•
Prioritizing
M[...]'s Well
-
being:
The
decis
i
on
regarding contact must always prioritize M[...]'s emotional safety
and psychological stab
i
lity,
with the
understanding
t
hat
contact,
if
not
carefully
managed, could exacerbate her existing r
i
sks.
7.
Ongoing
Monitoring
and
Review
:
M[...]'s
risk
prof
il
e
is
dynam
i
c
and
requires
continuous
assessment
and
adaptation
of
the support
plan.
•
Regular
Risk
Reviews:
Her
risk status
should
be
formally
re
v
iewed
on a regular bas
i
s
(e.g., weekly
initially,
then
bi-weekly
or
monthly
as
stability
is
achieved) by
the treating
psychologist
and soc
i
a
l
worker.
•
Multidisciplinary
Team
Involvement:
All
professionals
involved
in
M[...]'s
care
(psychologist,
social
worker,
psychiatrist,
school
personnel,
family
members)
should
maintain open
communication
and
participate in
periodic
reviews
of
her
progress,
adherence
to
safety
plans,
and
overall
well-being.
•
Adaption
of plan:
The
safety plan and therapeutic interventions should be fluid and
adjusted based on M[...]’s evolving needs, responses to
treatment, and any changes in her environment or emotional state.
”
[22]
The report of Dr Del
Fabbro, is a very thorough and as appears above, contains carefully
considered and comprehensive recommendations.
This report must be
provided to M[...]’s therapist who should work through and
implement the recommendations together with
M[...], and with the
input of the mother and the father, where appropriate.
[23]
I am persuaded that
M[...] cannot be forced to live with or have contact with her mother
against her will, in her current vulnerable
state. I am also
persuaded that a relocation is not in M[...]’s best interests
at this point. It appears that Ms Nell did
not take heed of Dr Del
Fabbro’s important findings in relation to M[...]’s
compromised emotional state.
SCHOOLING AND
EDUCATION
[24]
The father acknowledges
that there were difficulties experienced with respect to the
children’s schooling, but he contends
that the mother’s
version in relation to the schooling is denied. He contends that any
delays in facilitating the educational
requirements of the children
was a direct result of the mother’s actions, and/or neglect and
that he has remedied all such
matters in a timely and diligent
fashion.
[25]
Regrettably, no proof
of the father’s allegation could be provided, despite the
mother’s repeated requests for the father
to do so. I have
serious concerns about the seemingly laissez-faire attitude that
appears to have been adopted in relation to the
children’s
education.
[26]
It is imperative that
both children’s education is prioritised by the father urgently
and that efforts be made to catch them
up on missed schoolwork so
that they are ready to begin afresh in the new year at new schools. I
address this in my order below.
THE RELOCATION
[27]
The father wishes to
relocate to Simon’s Towns with the children and his partner,
C[...] P[...] (“
C[...]
”)
but it seems that there is no real plan in this regard. I am not
satisfied with the evidence which the father has put up
insofar as
the proposed relocation is concerned. It does not seem to have been
properly thought through or planned. The mother’s
criticisms in
this regard seem well founded. The issue of the relocation can be
revisited the court hearing part B.
[28]
I am also persuaded by
the report of Dr Del Fabbro that the proposed relocation would be
contrary to M[...]’s best interests
and would unduly
destabilise and unsettle her. M[...] is especially vulnerable at this
time and may not cope with the effects of
a relocation. She has had
enough trauma and upheaval and cannot risk even more destabilisation
now.
[29]
Given the concerns
raised by the mother in respect of the children’s education
coupled with the fact that no proof of the
children’s education
could be provided by the father, I have serious concerns in relation
to the children’s education
and to now move them to new
schools, in a new province when they are apparently so far behind
where they ought to be, is not in
their best interests.
[30]
A further concern
raised by the mother was the fact that her relationship with the
children has been severely negatively impacted,
and that she wishes
to be afforded an opportunity to mend her relationship with them. Ms
Nell reports that the mother “
shows
insight into her transgressions, takes responsibility for her
actions, and wants to rebuild her relationship with her children
.”
[31]
Ms Nell recommends that
primary residence of the children should revert to the mother at this
stage. Dr Del Fabbro recommends only
supervised contact between the
mother and the M[...] having regard to the anxiety and trauma that
M[...] has experienced. C[...]and
M[...] cannot be separated from one
another, and both expressly report that they are doing better with
their father from an emotional
and psychological point of view They
categorically expressed that they do not want to live at their
mother’s home.
[32]
Although the children
do not experience the mothers “
insight
into her transgressions”,
or
her taking “
responsibility
for her actions”,
referred to by Ms Nell, an opportunity must be given to the children
and their mother to rebuild their relationship with professional
guidance and oversight. The restoration of the relationship between
mother and children must be a priority for both the father
and the
mother.
[33]
There is a disparity
between the financial position of the mother and that of the father.
It seems that the mother’s financial
position is far stronger
than that of the father and that she has a successful business which
has operated for some time, whilst
the father appears to have
struggled to secure himself financially over the years. At this stage
the mother does not pay cash maintenance
for the children but covers
numerous direct expenses on their behalf. In these circumstances, I
propose to order that the mother
pay for the fees of the
professionals whom I propose to appoint in order to deal with the
fall out within the family.
[34]
I interviewed both
children separately in chambers. I was impressed by their maturity
and insight. They were both extremely articulate
and clear not only
in the expression of their views and wishes, but also in the
justification and reasoning for holding the views
expressed. What
emerged from the respective interviews was that-:
34.1
They both feel safe and
emotionally secure in their father’s care and wish to remain
there;
34.2
They have been through
tremendous trauma;
34.3
C[...]is lonely and
doesn’t have friends, she is unhappy with home schooling and
wants to be part of a traditional school
where she can make friends.
She is somewhat embarrassed that she is a year behind her peers and
that her schoolwork is not up to
date. This concerns her especially
because she wishes to attend a new school next year and wants to be
on the correct academic
level to be able to “fit in” with
her classmates and make friends;
34.4
M[...] feels that
she can now relax and be a 16-year-old in her father’s care
whilst she is required to be vigilant and assume
the role of an adult
whilst in her mother’s care;
34.5
That C[...]is fiercely
loyal to M[...] and in fact considers M[...] to be her main source of
safety and security;
34.6
That neither child
wishes to have contact with their mother
at
this stage
as they
are
inter alia
concerned that she will react negatively to them, they feel
ambivalent towards her. They bear a level of anger towards her but
also love her;
34.7
their father’s
partner C[...], plays a significant and positive role in their lives.
C[...] is exceptionally kind, caring
and empathetic towards them. She
also appears to play a practical role in assisting them in their day
to day lives. M[...] particularly
considers C[...] to be her
confidante and a source of support. Both children referenced C[...]’s
important role in their
lives.
[35]
The children need to be
afforded an opportunity to settle down and heal with the support and
guidance of the relevant professionals.
The mother and the children
need to be given an opportunity to rebuild and mend their
relationships with the support of the appropriate
professionals. The
children’s education needs to caught up and regularised.
[36]
The children both
struck me as incredibly intelligent and there is no good reason why
they should not be given every opportunity
to achieve their full
potential and go on to self-actualise. I have had regard to the
reports and to the recommendations therein
contained and I have
incorporated those that I believe to be in the children’s best
interests into the order which follows.
[37]
As to costs, I am not
minded to make an order adverse to either party at this stage. The
complexity and sensitivity of the issues
before the court and the
considerations of the best interests of the children must prevail. As
such, I shall order that each party
pays his/her own costs of Part A.
[38]
The following order is
granted:-
37.1
The Applicant’s non-compliance with
the Rules of Court and the Practice Manual of the Gauteng Division is
condoned to the
extent that is necessary, and this application is
entertained as one of urgency in terms of the provisions of Rule
6(12)(a) of
the Uniform Rules of Court.
37.2
The matter is postponed to the opposed roll in the Family Court on 31
March 2026. The Applicant shall enrol
the matter for hearing on that
date, by taking all such steps as are necessary with the Registrar of
the Family Court to secure
such enrollment.
37.3
Pending the hearing of Part B of the application, and the matter on
31 March 2026, it is ordered as follows:
37.3.1 The Respondent is
interdicted from relocating to Cape Town or any other province with
the minor children, namely M[...] M[...]
S[...](“
M[...]
”)
born on 11 March 2009 and C[...](“
C[…]
”)
born on 16 September 2015 (“
the children
”);
37.3.2 Primary residence
of the children shall vest with the Respondent;
37.3.3 The Applicant
shall have contact to the children:
37.3.3.1
for the first month following on this order, once a week for a period
of 2 hours
on a day and at a time that is convenient to the parties,
supervised by a social worker of the mother’s choice and at the
mother’s cost;
37.3.3.2
for the second and third month following on this order, twice a week
for a period
of 2 hours per contact session on days and at times that
are convenient to the parties supervised by a social worker of the
mother’s
choice and at the mother’s cost;
37.3.3.3
from the fourth month following on this order, contact shall take
place in accordance
with the recommendations of the Parenting
Coordinator;
37.3.3.4
via electronic/telephonic means daily,
provided
that M[...] may not be forced to exercise the contact referred to in
paragraphs 37.3.3 against her will.
37.3.4 The contact
referred to in 37.3.3 shall increase alternatively decrease in
frequency and duration in accordance with the
recommendations of the
Parenting Coordinator, who shall have due regard to:
37.3.4.1
The
views and wishes of the children;
37.3.4.2
The input and
feedback
from Melanie Frankel;
37.3.4.3
The input of
M[...]’s
psychiatrist;
37.3.4.4
The input of
the Applicant
and Respondent.
37.3.5 The parties shall
procure immediate therapeutic intervention:
37.3.5.1
for M[...], with psychologist, Melanie Frankel (
Ms
Frankel
)
[email:
f[…]
];
37.3.5.2
for C[…], with psychologist Mary Bothma (
Ms
Bothma
)
[email:
m[…]
];
Ms Frankel and Ms Bothma
shall respectively use their best endeavours to facilitate the
restoration of the relationship between
the Applicant and the
respective children via reconstructive and bonding therapy, which
therapy shall be at the Applicant’s
cost and on such days and
at such times as Ms Frankel and Ms Bothma may respectively direct.
37.3.6 The Applicant
shall make payment of the costs of the Parenting Coordinator, Ms
Frankel and Ms Bothma.
37.4
The minor child, M[...] shall be evaluated by a qualified
psychiatrist to provide recommendations regarding
M[...]’s
future treatment and care. The parties shall comply with all
reasonable recommendations made by the appointed psychiatrist
regarding M[...]’s treatment and care. The psychiatrist shall
file a report reflecting M[...]’s diagnosis, treatment,
prognosis and future recommendations for M[...]’s psychiatric
care by 6 March 2026.
37.5 A
Parenting Coordinator shall be appointed to facilitate the resolution
of the disputes arising from the
exercise of the parties’
parental responsibilities and rights in respect of the children,
which will include but not be limited
to:
37.5.1 Contact between
the Applicant and the children including the determination of whether
that contact should be increased or
decreased in frequency and
duration, or supervised by a social worker;
37.5.2 Drug testing /
alcohol testing for the Applicant and Respondent and/or M[...];
37.5.3 The powers of the
Parenting Coordinator are attached as annexure “
B
”
to this order;
37.5.4 The Parenting
Coordinator shall by no later than 6 March 2026 file a report with
recommendations concerning
inter alia
the manner in which the
parties have complied with her process, the progress that has
been made in the restoration of the
relationship between the children
and the Applicant, the educational progress of the children and any
further relevant information
which the Parenting Coordinator deems
appropriate.
37.6
The Applicant and the
Respondent will refer the appointment of a suitably qualified
Parenting Coordinator to the Chairperson of
the Gauteng Family Law
Forum, who will be requested to make an immediate nomination.
37.7
The
Applicant and the Respondent shall respectively attend a
comprehensive parenting course with educational psychologist, Ms
Carol
Anne Wootton (“
Ms
Wootton
”)
(email:
c[…]
).
Both parties shall provide the Parenting Coordinator with a
certificate of attendance and completion of the parenting course
with
Ms Wootton. Each parent shall make payment of his/her costs in
respect of their attendance at Ms Wootton.
37.8
The reports of Ms Sarie
Nell and Dr Del Fabbro shall be provided to the Parenting
Coordinator, Ms Frankel, Ms Bothma, Ms Wootton
and the psychiatrist
appointed for M[...].
37.9
The Respondent shall,
within 15 days of the date of the grant of this order:-
37.9.1
provide the Applicant
and the Parenting Coordinator with written confirmation of the
children’s respective enrolment at a
home-schooling tutoring
facility from such facility;
37.9.2 provide the
Applicant and the Parenting Coordinator with written confirmation
that the children have completed all of the
recommended, necessary
and prescribed work in their respective curricula in each of their
chosen subjects;
37.9.3 alternatively to
37.9.2 above, and only in the event that the children have
not
completed all of the recommended, necessary and prescribed work in
their respective curricula in each of their chosen subjects,
the
Respondent shall provide the Applicant and the Parenting Coordinator
with written confirmation of all steps to be taken by
the Respondent,
the children and the home-schooling tutoring facility to ensure that
the children will, by 1 December 2025, have
completed all of the
recommended, necessary and prescribed work in their respective
curricula, in each of their chosen subjects,
such that the children
shall both have passed the grades in which they are respectively
enrolled with such proficiency as to enable
them to progress to the
next age equivalent grade at a registered CAPS school (for C[…])
and an appropriate institution
of learning (for M[...]) and be
on the equivalent academic level as their classmates in their
respective new schools in 2026.
37.10
In the event that there
is a doubt in relation to the children’s respective academic
levels of proficiency or whether they
have met their curriculum
benchmarks, the children may be referred by either parent or by the
Parenting Coordinator to an educational
psychologist alternatively
with a career guidance specialist for an appropriate assessment.
37.11
The
Applicant shall submit herself to
regular random drug and alcohol testing to be conducted upon 4 hours’
notice at the request
of the Parenting Coordinator.
37.12
The Applicant and the
Respondent shall each file a supplementary affidavit on or before 16
March 2026, setting out
inter
alia
the manner in
which they have complied with this order, the progress that has
been made in the restoration of the relationship
between the children
and the Applicant, the educational progress of the children and
details of their schooling in 2026 and any
further relevant
information which they deem appropriate.
37.13
Each party shall pay
his/her own costs in respect of Part A of the application.
SEGAL
AJ
ACTING JUDGE OF THE
HIGH COURT
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
Delivered:
This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is
reflected and is handed down
electronically by circulation to the
Parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to
the electronic file of
this matter on CaseLines. The date for
hand-down is deemed to be
on
18 August 2025.
Heard
on:
29 July 2025
Delivered
on: 18 August 2025
Appearances:
Adv
F Bezuidenhout:
Joselowitz
& Andrews Attorneys: for the
Applicant
In
person
for the Respondent
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
J.B v S (A24/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 839 (27 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 839High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.W v B.T (2022/022689) [2025] ZAGPJHC 120 (17 February 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 120High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
T.N v T.N (042122/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 863 (15 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 863High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.C.T v S.T (2019/22316) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1123 (31 October 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 1123High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
J.F.L v T.G.L (A3080/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 90 (6 February 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 90High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar