Macwele v Road Accident Fund (2021/53692) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1236 (6 October 2023)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 1236 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Macwele v Road Accident Fund (2021/53692) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1236 (6 October 2023) Macwele v Road Accident Fund (2021/53692) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1236 (6 October 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_1236.html sino date 6 October 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2021/53692 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED 06/10/23 In the matter between: MACWELE, SIBUSISO NASHI PLAINTIFF And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND DEFENDANT JUDGMENT WRIGHT J 1.  The plaintiff, Mr Macwele is 41 years old. He was injured in a road accident in 2017 when he was 35 years old. He has sued the Fund for damages. The Fund pleaded and the matter comes before me on trial. The Fund conceded the merits 100% in favour of Mr Macwele. His counsel, Mr MH Mokale and the Fund’s counsel, Ms P Nziyanziya are agreed that the Fund has already given the plaintiff a certificate to cover future hospital and related expenses. 2.  A small claim for past medical expenses was not proceeded with. By agreement, claims for past and future loss of earnings are to be postponed. 3.  The only issue before me is that of general damages. The Fund accepts liability. The question is the amount. The legal team for Mr Macwele filed a number of expert reports, including one for an orthopaedic surgeon, one for a neurosurgeon and one for an occupational therapist. It was agreed between counsel that I should proceed on these expert reports as confirmed by affidavits by the experts. 4.  The following facts are either common cause or not seriously disputed: 4.1 Before the accident Mr Macwele was normal. He used to play soccer. 4.2 In the accident Mr Macwele was reportedly rendered unconscious, although there is a note by the neurosurgeon that on admission to hospital the GCS reading was 15/15, indicating consciousness. He was taken to hospital with an open neck wound, operated on and remained in intensive care for three months, suffering acute pain. 4.3 Mr Macwele was rendered quadriplegic. He can stand but not for long periods. According to the neurosurgeon, Mr Macwele’s “ hands are better than the legs “ but Mr Macwele can’t walk or use his hands to take care of himself. 4.4 Mr Macwele has muscle atrophy and spasticity in his arms and legs and he can’t grasp with his hands. He is wheelchair bound. 4.5 Mr Macwele suffered a mild traumatic head injury. 4.6 Mr Macwele suffers headaches about twice a week. 4.7 Mr Macwele has reduced memory. 4.8 Mr Macwele suffers bladder and bowel incontinence. 4.9 Mr Macwele is in constant pain and is dependent on others for daily life tasks. 4.10 Mr Macwele is at risk of developing bedsores and septicemia. 4.11 Mr Macwele is depressed and suicidal. 4.12 Mr Macwele has scars on the left side of his head in the parietal area and he has scars as a result of the use of cone callipers. 5.  The injuries and their consequences are severe and the amount to be awarded for general damages needs to be fair to compensate Mr Macwele. 6.  In Mertz v Road Accident Fund 2022 JDR 3771 (GP), a judgment given by a Full Court of the High Court in Pretoria on 2 December 2022 an award of R3.5m was made in favour of a plaintiff in similar circumstances to Mr Macwele. 7. In Mertz, the plaintiff, a woman was left with a prominent tracheotomy scar 6cm long and a well healed anterior neck scar about 6cm long. Ms Mertz suffered acute respiratory failure. She can use her left hand to operate a computer and to hold a spoon. In the present case, Mr Mokale, for Mr Macwele conceded that Mr Macwele was not reported to have specific respiratory problems.  However, Mr Macwele can’t grasp with either hand. 8. In my view, Mertz being a recent Full Court decision, I should follow it, allowing for two of the more important differences between the two cases, namely that Ms Mertz but not Mr Macwele suffered respiratory problems and Ms Mertz can use her left hand for limited tasks while Mr Macwele can’t use either hand. 9. A fair award in the present case for general damages is R3.5 million. 10. Counsel handed up a draft order dealing with various matters. I am to make it an order having decided only the question of general damages. ORDER X as amended. GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD  :  5 to 6 October 2023 DELIVERED :  6 October 2023 APPEARANCES  : APPLICANT Adv Morari Mokale morarimok@gmail.com 082 563 0262 Instructed by Mkwanazi M.I & Associates Attorneys Inc sibusiso@mkwanaziandassociates.co.za 083292 6996 RESPONDENTS Adv Pumza Nziyanziya Instructed by State Attorneys Mr Tshepo Ngomana 073 102 9764 tshepon1@raf.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start