africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 1180South Africa

Paramount Property Fund Limited v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (2022-15013) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1180 (18 October 2023)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
18 October 2023
OTHER J, WRIGHT J, Respondent J, Wright J, Adv J, October 2018 have

Headnotes

in 2003 to 2004 to resolve disputes. Two new large delivery points were constructed by Eskom. Eskom was unaware for some time that power was being taken by the applicant from 2003 to 2020.

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 1180 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Paramount Property Fund Limited v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (2022-15013) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1180 (18 October 2023) Paramount Property Fund Limited v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (2022-15013) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1180 (18 October 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_1180.html sino date 18 October 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2022-15013 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED 18/10/23 In the matter between: PARAMOUNT PROPERTY FUND LIMITED Applicant And ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC LTD Respondent JUDGMENT WRIGHT J 1. The applicant company owns a piece of immovable commercial property which it lets to tenants. The tenants demand a supply of electricity. The respondent, Eskom supplies the electricity. 2. The applicant seeks a declarator that Eskom’s invoices for the three year period before October 2018 have prescribed and it sought, in the original notice of motion, payment from Eskom of R380 000, which it says it paid under protest to avoid a cut off. This sum increased to R407 000 in the replying affidavit. Counsel for the applicant in argument said that he did not proceed with the R407 000 claim but limited the claim to R380 000. In my view, the applicant could not have calculated a figure of R407 000 unless it had a meter or meters on its property which it read when it wanted to. 3. Eskom seeks dismissal of the application and raises a conditional counterclaim for R223 000. 4. The applicant says that Eskom’s billing and administration is chaotic and that Eskom never billed the applicant for the period May 2003 to October 2018. The applicant is vague as to why it did not query the non-receipt of invoices for fifteen years. A simple “ verbal “ agreement with Eskom is alleged. In effect, the applicant pleads prescription for twelve years from 2003 to 2015. Whether or not the Eskom employee who concluded the alleged “verbal“ agreement, if such agreement was concluded, had authority is a matter which should be decided in a trial. 5. The answering affidavit raises huge disputes of fact. The deponent says that the applicant knows how much power it used over the years but kept quiet. Multiple accounts were opened covering the property in question. Meetings were held in 2003 to 2004 to resolve disputes. Two new large delivery points were constructed by Eskom. Eskom was unaware for some time that power was being taken by the applicant from 2003 to 2020. 6. The replying affidavit does nothing to lessen the wide area of dispute of fact. 7. There is no replying affidavit in the counter-application. 8. This case needs full pleadings, including on the question of prescription, full discovery, possibly expert notices and then a trial. ORDER 1. The notice of motion stands as a simple summons. 2. The notice to oppose stands as a notice of intention to defend. 3. The applicant is to deliver a declaration by 30 November 2023. 4. Thereafter, the matter proceeds as a trial action. 5. Costs reserved. GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD : 18 October 2023 DELIVERED : 18 October 2023 APPEARANCES : APPLICANT Adv J C Viljoen jcv.law@mweb.com 083 289 5120 Instructed by Liebenberg Malan Liezel Attorneys litigation3@liebenrgmalam.co.za 012 460 4149 RESPONDENT Adv P L Uys 083 388 4679 lafras@lulaw.co.za Instructed by Devachander Attorneys 011 894 4400 shevira@devainc.co.za / admin@devainc.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Paramount Property Fund and Another v New Africa Capital Group (2023/128784) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1079 (23 October 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1079High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Paramount Property Fund Ltd v Haupt :In re: Haupt v Paramount Property Fund Ltd (A5048/2020; 2015/32685) [2022] ZAGPJHC 508 (27 July 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 508High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Just Splendid (Pty) Ltd and Another v Khunou and Others (2023/103030) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1175 (17 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1175High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Board of Sheriffs v Cibe (000219/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 583 (21 June 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 583High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Roadies Association v National Arts Councils of South Africa and Others (2023/076030) [2024] ZAGPJHC 936 (20 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 936High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar

Discussion