Case Law[2022] ZAGPJHC 130South Africa
Ramantsane v Road Accident Fund (23697/2019) [2022] ZAGPJHC 130; - (10 March 2022)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
10 March 2022
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2022
>>
[2022] ZAGPJHC 130
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Ramantsane v Road Accident Fund (23697/2019) [2022] ZAGPJHC 130; - (10 March 2022)
Ramantsane v Road Accident Fund (23697/2019) [2022] ZAGPJHC 130; - (10 March 2022)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_130.html
sino date 10 March 2022
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 23697/2019
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED.
10/3/222
In
the matter between:
RAMANTSANE
ESTER DIKELEDI
Plaintiff
and
ROAD
ACCIDENT
FUND
Defendant
JUDGMENT
MAKUME
J
:
introduction
[1]
On the 24
th
February 2018 the Plaintiff who was then 29
years old was a passenger in a motor vehicle with Registration number
[....] driven
by one Kabelo Monareng. A collision occurred near
the Mall of Africa Shopping Mall in Midrand between that motor
vehicle
and another motor vehicle with Registration number [....]
there and then drive by one Modise.
[2]
The Plaintiff sustained bodily injuries which are described in detail
in the medical
records. As a result the Plaintiff is now seeking
payment of damages from the Defendant under the following heads:
i)
General
Damages for pain suffering and disfigurement.
ii)
Past
Medical Expenses.
iii)
Future
Medical Expenses.
iv)
Future
Loss of Earning Capacity.
[3]
The Defendant has conceded liability and agreed to compensate the
Plaintiff for its
proven damages.
[4]
When the hearing commenced before me on the 8
th
February
2022 both legal representatives of the parties informed me that:
4.1 The
amount for General Damages has been settled and agreed upon in the
amount of R550 000.00 (Five Hundred
Thousand Rand).
4.2 The
Defendant has also agreed to pay the Plaintiff Future Medical
Expenses by issuing a Certificate in terms
of Section 17(4) of the
Act.
4.3 The
only outstanding claims to be decided by the Court are:
-
Past Medical Expenses.
-
Future Loss of Earning Capacity.
[5]
The Plaintiff was ready to commence with the matter when Counsel for
the Defendant
indicated that he need time to read and apprise himself
of the Expert reports as he only received instructions that morning.
The matter then stood down to Wednesday the 9
th
February
2022. I made an order that the Defendant pay the wasted costs
of the day.
[6]
On Wednesday the 9
th
February 2022 Mr Naidoo for the
Defendant was not available on Teams at the agreed time of 10.00.
The matter only commenced
at 11.00am. All the Plaintiff’s
expert reports were by agreement between the parties handed in as
evidence. They
are the expert reports of the following doctors:
6.1 Dr
RS Ngobeni -
Orthopaedic Surgeon
6.2 Dr
RS Ngobeni -
Serious injury assessment
6.3 Dr
A Mazwi
-
Neurosurgeon
6.4 Dr
A Mazwi
-
Serious injury
report
6.5
Hlezephi Matlou -
Clinical Psychologist
6.6
Mbekiseni Dhlamini -
Occupational Therapist
6.7
Zaheer Fakir
-
Industrial
Psychologist
6.8
Algorithm
- Consultants and
Actuaries
[7]
The Plaintiff testified and also called Ms Raisibe Idah Makgamatho
her supervisor
at Ster-Kinekor as a witness. The evidence of
the two ladies dovetails each other and confirm the following:
-
That the Plaintiff was an active person at work as a result she
received promotion.
-
Since her return to work she is no longer as agile as she used to be
and can no
longer work overtime as a result her salary has dropped.
-
She now and then had to be off work to attend medical Treatment.
-
Now and then at work she has to take a rest.
-
She uses crutches to go up and down the stairs.
-
She did not pay the amount being claimed for Past Medical Expenses.
She
does not know who paid presumably her employer because it is them
who removed her form Tembisa Hospital (A Provincial Public Hospital)
to Zamokuhle a Private Hospital.
[8]
The Plaintiff has now in the draft order abandoned the claim for Past
Medical Expenses.
What remains is how much the Court should
award in respect of Loss of Earnings. The Actuary has
calculated her Loss of Future
Earnings to be the amount of R1 560
369.00 having applied reasonable contingency deduction. I had
no difficulty accepting
that calculation as being correct It was
based on the other expert reports which were accepted into evidence
without any opposition.
[9]
In the result I hereby grant judgment in favour of the Plaintiff and
order that the
Defendant make payment to the Plaintiff the following
amounts set out hereunder which amounts shall be paid into the Trust
Account
of the Plaintiff’s Attorneys being Messrs NT Mdlalose
Incorporated Trust Account Nedbank Account Number [....]
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that
the Defendant pay to the Plaintiff the following amounts:
i)
R
550 000.00
General Damages
ii)
R1
560 369.00
Future Loss of Earnings
_____________
iii)
R2
110 369.00
Total
_____________
iv)
The
above amount shall be paid into the Trust Account of the Plaintiff’s
Attorneys as set out in paragraph 9 above by not
later than 180 days
from date of this order
v)
The
Defendant shall furnish to the Plaintiff an undertaking to pay 100%
of the costs of the future medical costs of the Plaintiff
at any
hospital or nursing home or treatment of or rending service or supply
of goods to the Plaintiff arising out of the injuries
sustained in
the motor collision of 24
th
February 2018 and the sequelae thereto after and costs have been
incurred and copy proof thereof in terms of
Section 17
(4) (a) of the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
vi)
The
Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff’s taxed or agreed party and
party costs which shall include Counsel’s fees for
two days on
the applicable High Court Scale as well as the qualifying fees of the
experts.
vii)
In
the event costs are not agreed upon the parties agree that the
Plaintiff shall serve a notice of taxation on the Defendant Attorneys
and afford the Defendant 14 days to pay the taxed costs.
DATED at JOHANNESBURG
this the 10 day of MARCH 2022.
_________________________________
M
A MAKUME
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
DATE
OF HEARING
:
08 FEBRUARY 2022
DATE
OF JUDGMENT :
10 MARCH 2022
FOR
APPLICANT
:
Adv Molope-Madondo
INSTRUCTED
BY
:
NT Mdlalose Attorneys
FOR
RESPONDENT
:
Attorney Naidoo
INSTRUCTED
BY
:
Office of the State Attorney Johannesburg
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Ramotsoele and Others v Ramotsoele and Others (30681/2017) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1172 (17 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1172High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Ramokoka v S (A181/2019) [2022] ZAGPJHC 759 (23 September 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 759High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Rametse v Mathada and Others (2023-056232) [2023] ZAGPJHC 712 (19 June 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 712High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Ramakone and Others v City of Johannesburg and Another (2020/19611) [2023] ZAGPJHC 916 (15 August 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 916High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Ramontja v Legal Aid South Africa (2021/44369) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1222 (26 November 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 1222High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar