Case Law[2025] ZAGPPHC 665South Africa
Baloyi v Road Accident Fund (3959/18) [2025] ZAGPPHC 665 (27 June 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
27 June 2025
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPPHC 665
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Baloyi v Road Accident Fund (3959/18) [2025] ZAGPPHC 665 (27 June 2025)
Baloyi v Road Accident Fund (3959/18) [2025] ZAGPPHC 665 (27 June 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_665.html
sino date 27 June 2025
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
CASE
NUMBER:
3959/18
(1)
REPORTABLE: NO
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)
REVISED.
DATE
27/06/2025
SIGNATURE
In
the matter between:
BALOYI
VINCENT ATLHOLANE
And
ROAD
ACCIDENT FUND
JUDGMENT
DE
JAGER AJ
[1]
This matter was before me for adjudication on 25 June
2025, set down on the Trial Default Judgement Roll. The claim is for
an amount
in excess of R10 000 000.00 (Ten Million Rand).
[2]
The expert reports uploaded substantiating the Plaintiff’s
traumatic brain injury contain
several factual statements that the
Plaintiff is forgetful, unable to count, or to be left alone as he
gets lost. Family members
further report that the Plaintiff is
mentally unstable and spends time with people in the community who
are psychotic.
[3]
The expert reports and counsel during argument confirmed that the
Plaintiff is functionally illiterate.
[4]
A practice note and heads of arguments were filed, these did not deal
with the Plaintiff’s
ability to furnish instructions or manage
his own affairs.
[5]
It appears that merits have not been conceded or adjudicated despite
an offer and acceptance for
general damages in the amount of
R350 000.00 (Three Hundred and Fifty Thousand Rand). Counsel was
not able to indicate how
this occurred, or even if it is possible.
[6]
The Plaintiff, despite the above, attested to affidavits in this
matter and ostensibly instructed
his legal team. After deliberation
with counsel about the ability of the Plaintiff to instruct his legal
representatives, it was
requested that this matter be removed. The
matter stood down to 27 June 2025.
[7]
It appears that subsequent to the appearance on 25 June 2025, a
proposed deed of trust, and appointment
of a trustee was uploaded.
This is a belated attempt at trying to protect future funds that may
be awarded to the Plaintiff, in
circumstances where the Plaintiff on
what is currently before Court, cannot sensibly give instruction to
the legal team. This is
not acceptable.
[9]
I am compelled to appoint an independent curator
ad litem
to
assist the Plaintiff and report to Court.
[10]
Accordingly, the following order is made:
1.
That a Curator
ad litem
is to be appointed in the matter by
the acting Deputy Judge President, N Davis.
2.
The Pretoria Society of Advocates, under the leadership of Adv L
Haupt within 5 (five days) of this order nominate a senior advocate,
of more than 20 years adequate experience in matters of personal
injury to act as Curator
ad litem
in this matter on behalf of
the Plaintiff.
3.
The name of such nominated Curator
ad litem
to be communicated
to the Honourable Justice N Davis.
4.
The nominated Curator
ad litem
to assist the Plaintiff in this
matter with the powers and duties as set out below.
5.
The nominated Curator
ad litem
is authorised to approach the
Acting Deputy Judge President, alternatively a Judge in chambers to
extend the powers and functions
in the event that such powers and
functions as set out is not sufficient.
6.
The nominated Curator within 30 court days of today, being
11
August 2025
report to Honourable Justice N Davies in this matter,
specifically regarding the following matters:
6.1
The Plaintiff’s ability to manage his own financial affairs and
take decisions with
regards to his person;
6.2
The acceptance of the amount of R350 000.00 (Three Hundred and
Fifty Thousand Rand)
as full and final settlement for general damages
in this matter [CASELINES 12 (1)];
6.3
How the amount for general damages received by the Plaintiff’s
attorneys has been
utilized;
6.4
The signed confirmatory affidavit of the Plaintiff dated 24 January
2025 [CASELINES 009:2],
given the severity of the brain injury of the
Plaintiff and the reports by experts indicating that the Plaintiff
cannot read;
6.5
The validity of the contingency fee agreement uploaded under
[CASELINES 13];
6.6
The suitability of the current legal representation of the Plaintiff
to continue the representation
of the Plaintiff in this matter;
6.7
The costs, if any of the action to date including costs associated
with the appearance on
25 and 27 June 2025;
6.8
The belated (26 June 2025) uploaded deed of the trust;
6.9
The further conduct of the current action and any further potential
claims that the Plaintiff
may have, including the possible rescission
of the full and final award of R350 000.00 in general damages.
7.
The attorneys of record are ordered to provide the curator with
copies
of all information and documents relating to the Plaintiff’s
claim.
8.
The Plaintiff’s attorneys to attend to the urgent service of
this order by sheriff on the offices of the Pretoria Bar, and via
email on
8.1
Adv
L Haupt (Pretoria Bar)
a[...]
;
8.2
Office
Manager – Petra Jacobs (Pretoria Bar)
m[...]
9.
The costs of the 25 and 27 June 2025 is reserved.
J DE JAGER
ACTING
JUDGE, THE HIGH COURT
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
Date
of hearing : 25 June 2025
Date
of Judgment : 27 June 2025
Appearances:
For
The Plaintiff : Adv. Brian
Matlhape
Instructed
by :
Chauke J Attorneys Inc
For
The Defendant : No Appearances
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Baleni v Road Accident Fund (39299/2020) [2024] ZAGPPHC 58 (29 January 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 58High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Sello v Road Accident Fund (19825/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1077 (29 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 1077High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Baloyi v Minister of Police (20987/2017) [2022] ZAGPPHC 579 (30 March 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 579High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Mthisi v Road Accident Fund (2023/115885) [2025] ZAGPPHC 402 (8 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 402High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Matlala v Road Accident Fund [2023] ZAGPPHC 86; 50698/2020 (6 February 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 86High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar