S.A.V v H.J.V (Recusal) (2138/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1295 (29 November 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 1295 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## S.A.V v H.J.V (Recusal) (2138/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1295 (29 November 2024) S.A.V v H.J.V (Recusal) (2138/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1295 (29 November 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_1295.html sino date 29 November 2024 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy # REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA ## CASE NUMBER: 2138 / 2021 CASE NUMBER: 2138 / 2021 1) REPORTABLE: YES /NO 2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES /NO 3) REVISED: YES / NO SIGNATURE DATE: 29 NOVEMBER 2024 In the matter between : # S[...] A[...] V[...]                                                                           Applicant S[...] A[...] V[...]                                                                           Applicant and # H[...] J[...] V[...]                                                                       Respondent H[...] J[...] V[...]                                                                       Respondent This Judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties and or parties’ representatives by email and by being uploaded to CaseLines. The date and time for the hand down is deemed to be at 10h00 on 29 November 2024. # # JUDGMENT – RECUSAL JUDGMENT – RECUSAL ## M SNYMAN, AJ M SNYMAN, AJ [1] Before me is an application for my recusal. The application was heard before the application for leave to appeal. [2] I find that there is no merit in the recusal application. Order [3] The following order is therefore issued: 1. The application for recusal is dismissed; 2. Should any of the parties desire reasons for that decision, it can be requested in terms of the rules of court. ## BY ORDER BY ORDER M SNYMAN, AJ DATE HEARD: 22 November 2024 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29 November 2024 Counsel for Applicant: Adv EA Lourens Applicants’ Attorneys: Werner Roos & Immelman Attorneys sino noindex make_database footer start