Case Law[2022] ZAGPPHC 840South Africa
Louwen v MEC For The Department of Health Gauteng (35801/19) [2022] ZAGPPHC 840 (19 October 2022)
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2022
>>
[2022] ZAGPPHC 840
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Louwen v MEC For The Department of Health Gauteng (35801/19) [2022] ZAGPPHC 840 (19 October 2022)
Louwen v MEC For The Department of Health Gauteng (35801/19) [2022] ZAGPPHC 840 (19 October 2022)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2022_840.html
sino date 19 October 2022
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
Case
No 35801/19
REPORTABLE:
YES/NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
REVISED
19
OCTOBER 2022
In
the matter between:
NHLABATHI
SAMUKELISIWE
LOUWEN PLAINTIFF
and
MEC
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
GAUTENG DEFENDANT
LEAVE
TO APPEAL
FRANCIS-SUBBIAH,
AJ:
[1]
The applicant/defendant seeks leave to
appeal against the entire judgment and order delivered on 22 July
2022 in this matter.
[2]
The respondent/plaintiff opposes the
application for leave to appeal.
[3]
In considering a leave to appeal there
must be reasonable prospects that another court may come to a
different conclusion.
[4]
The respondent opposed this application
on the basis that I had not erred in the findings and that there are
no prospects that another
court may come to a different conclusion.
[5]
Having read the papers and having heard
counsel I had considered the issues raised by the applicant in this
leave to appeal in coming
to a decision on the trial matter. I have
dealt in depth with many of the issues raised in the application in
my judgment.
[6]
I am of the view that there are
reasonable
prospects
that another court may come to a different conclusion. Leave to
appeal should therefore be granted to the Full Court of
the Gauteng
Division.
[7]
Accordingly the following order is made:
7.1
Leave to appeal to the Full Court of the
Gauteng Division is hereby granted.
7.2
The costs of this application are to be
costs in the appeal.
FRANCIS-SUBBIAH,
AJ
ACTING
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION
PRETORIA
Counsel
for
the
Applican/Defendant:
Adv
N
Manaka
Instructed
by:
State
Attorney
Counsel
for the Respondent/ Plaintiff: Adv
NGD Maritz SC
Instructed
by:
Joseph's
Inc
Date
of Hearing:
13
October 2022
Date
of Judgment:
19
October 2022
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Lourens v Mathie and Others (A11/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1389 (8 August 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1389High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
N.S obo A.S v MEC for Health Gauteng Provincial Government (32412/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 438 (2 June 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 438High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Lourens DP (Pty) Ltd v Engelbrecht N.O and Others (048287/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 841 (2 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 841High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Louw v Prinsloo and Another (2022/022132) [2023] ZAGPPHC 600 (21 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 600High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
A.N.M obo O.M v MEC for Health, Gauteng Provincial Government (21353/2018) [2022] ZAGPPHC 219 (23 March 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 219High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar