Lebelo v First National Bank (Leave to Appeal) (143809/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 728 (21 July 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPJHC 728 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Lebelo v First National Bank (Leave to Appeal) (143809/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 728 (21 July 2025) Lebelo v First National Bank (Leave to Appeal) (143809/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 728 (21 July 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_728.html sino date 21 July 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO : 143809/2024 DATE :  21-07-2025 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO. (3) REVISED. DATE 21 July 2025 In the matter between LENAH MOTLAHABO LEBELO                               Applicant and FIRST NATIONAL BANK                                        Respondent JUDGMENT EX TEMPORE LEAVE TO APPEAL WILSON, J :  The applicant, Ms Lebelo, seeks leave to appeal against my decision of 20 May 2025, removing her urgent application from the roll and directing each party to pay their own costs. An order removing a matter from the urgent roll is not appealable unless the applicant can establish irreparable harm of the nature that an appeal could remedy. In this case there is no such harm because the purpose of my order removing the application from the roll, as I explained in my judgment, was to allow Ms Lebelo to approach the urgent court again having stated the grounds on which she claims urgency. Instead of doing that, for reasons that I do not fully understand, Ms Lebelo has sought leave to appeal my order.  For the reasons I have given, the application for leave to appeal to cannot succeed. I make the following order: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 2. Each party will pay their own costs. WILSON, J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT 21 July 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start