Case Law[2024] ZAGPJHC 911South Africa
Tankard v Old Mutual Wealth (2024/096858) [2024] ZAGPJHC 911 (10 September 2024)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
10 September 2024
Headnotes
by her husband and she seeks payment of the proceeds. 4. She says, vaguely, that she needs the money otherwise she will be homeless. 5. No detail of her financial position is set out or her alleged inability to get other accommodation. 6. The answering affidavit raises a number of defences, including a defence that the wrong respondent has been cited, which I need not deal with as urgency is not proved.
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2024
>>
[2024] ZAGPJHC 911
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Tankard v Old Mutual Wealth (2024/096858) [2024] ZAGPJHC 911 (10 September 2024)
Tankard v Old Mutual Wealth (2024/096858) [2024] ZAGPJHC 911 (10 September 2024)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2024_911.html
sino date 10 September 2024
###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 2024/096858
1.
Reportable
2.
Of interest to other judges:
3.
Revised:
10
September 2024
In the matter between:
ROSANN
MAUREEN TANKARD
Applicant
and
OLD
MUTUAL WEALTH
Respondent
JUDGMENT
WRIGHT J
1.
The alleged applicant
lost her husband ten years ago, allegedly.
2.
She was allegedly
appointed executrix in his deceased estate about three months ago.
3.
The applicant seeks
urgently orders that the respondent disclose to her details of all
policies held by her husband and she seeks
payment of the proceeds.
4.
She says, vaguely, that
she needs the money otherwise she will be homeless.
5.
No detail of her
financial position is set out or her alleged inability to get other
accommodation.
6.
The answering affidavit
raises a number of defences, including a defence that the wrong
respondent has been cited, which I need
not deal with as urgency is
not proved.
ORDER
Struck off, costs
reserved. -
GC
Wright
Judge
of the High Court
Gauteng
Division, Johannesburg
HEARD
DELIVERED
:10
September 2024
:10
September 2024
APPEARANCES:
Applicant
Att.
Mr A.S Marais
laurencemelatoinc@gmail.com
016 421
1215/6
Instructed
by
Lawrence
Melato Inc Attorneys
Lawrencemelatoinc@gmail.com
016 421
1329
Respondent
Adv
LM Spiller
spiller@counsel.co.za
079 873
7397
Instructed
by
Walker
Inc
amienh@walkers.law
012 464
1400
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Beer v The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants and Another (29219/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 710 (20 September 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 710High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
South African Board of Sheriffs v Cibe (000219/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 583 (21 June 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 583High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
South African Securitization Program (RF) Limited and Others v Maxidor SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (2022/8473) [2024] ZAGPJHC 669 (25 July 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 669High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
South African Roadies Association v National Arts Councils of South Africa and Others (2023/076030) [2024] ZAGPJHC 936 (20 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 936High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar
South African Agricultural Machinery Association and Another v Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa and Others (20/44414) [2024] ZAGPJHC 824 (30 April 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 824High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)98% similar