University of Mpumalanga v Magma Masemola Attorneys Incorporated and Another (008531/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 906 (14 August 2023)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 906 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## University of Mpumalanga v Magma Masemola Attorneys Incorporated and Another (008531/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 906 (14 August 2023) University of Mpumalanga v Magma Masemola Attorneys Incorporated and Another (008531/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 906 (14 August 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_906.html sino date 14 August 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO :  008531/2022 DATE :  23-05-2023 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED In the matter between UNIVERSITY OF MPUMALANGA Applicant and MAGMA MASEMOLA ATTORNEYS INCORPORATED First Respondent LILLIANE EFTHMIADES Second Respondent J U D G M E N T LEAVE TO APPEAL WEPENER, J :   This is an application for leave to appeal.  It is directed at the costs order only and further it is limited that it is directed at a portion of the cost order only. The argument is that a certain portion of the costs should either have been paid by each party or by the respondent.  That further limits the issue that the applicant wishes to take on appeal. Such an issue is extremely limited and, in my view, does not warrant the attention and further costs in this matter.  It does not warrant the attention of a higher court nor the further incurrence of costs in this matter. If one has regard to the outcome of the matter, I believe that the costs order was appropriately included therein. I am not convinced that another court will come to a different conclusion on this extremely limited issue. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. - - - - - - - - - - - - WEPENER, J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT DATE : 14/08/23 I wish to record that this judgment was only received by my secretary for editing purposes on the 14th August 2023 at 13:26 and my office did not receive any enquiry regarding this judgment on the application for leave to appeal prior to today. sino noindex make_database footer start