Standard Bank of South Africa v Ntsumi Telecommunications (40868/19) [2022] ZAGPJHC 471 (18 July 2022)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2022 >> [2022] ZAGPJHC 471 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Standard Bank of South Africa v Ntsumi Telecommunications (40868/19) [2022] ZAGPJHC 471 (18 July 2022) Standard Bank of South Africa v Ntsumi Telecommunications (40868/19) [2022] ZAGPJHC 471 (18 July 2022) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_471.html sino date 18 July 2022 # IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA # GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO : 40868/19 DATE : 16 MARCH 2021 REPORTABLE: NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO REVISED Date : 18 July 2022 In the matter between STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA                       Applicant and NTSUMII TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MAYIR TAYOB ENO & SOLLY MNDLONDOBOZI        Respondent J U D G M E N T (APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) WEPENER, J COURT : In this matter I gave a judgment on 16 March 2021, which judgment in the main relied on a judgment of this Court, given by the late Van der Linde J, in BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v Intertrans Oil SA (Pty) Ltd & Others 2017 4592 GJ , in which he fully analysed the very points now argued in this application for leave to appeal and found against those points. I have read the notice of leave to appeal and I have listened to the arguments before me and I believe that there is no reasonable prospect of success that another Court would come to another decision and in the circumstances leave to appeal is REFUSED with costs. ADV V RENSBURG :    May it please, M'Lord. ADV VD MERWE :       As your Lordship pleases. END OF PROCEEDINGS WEPENER, J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT DATE : ………………………… TRANSCRIBER’S CERTIFICATE This is to certify that, insofar as it is audible , the aforegoing is a true and correct transcript of the proceedings recorded by means of a mechanical recorder in the matter of: STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA // NTSUMII TELECOMMUNICATIONS CASE NUMBER                                : 40868/19 RECORDED AT                                : JOHANNESBURG DATE HELD                                     : 16 MARCH 2021 TRANSCRIBER                                : Ronel Deysel NUMBER OF audio files                     : 1 NUMBER OF PAGES                         : 3 REPORT ON RECORDING 1. This is a verbatim transcript and being a true reflection of the record, the grammatical errors have not been corrected. 2. Names of persons, places or esoteric terms not spelt for the record, are transcribed phonetically. 3. Indistinct words and or phrases are as a result of: 3.1 The dialect of the witness;  and/or 3.2 Witness not near to microphone and speaking softly;  and/or 3.3 Poor Zoom connection. DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDING TRANSCRIPTIONS Glen Manor Office Park Tel.: (012) 940 6821 138 Frikkie de Beer Str             Fax: (012) 348 3542 Block 5, Suite 1/G www.digitalaudio.co.za Menlyn sino noindex make_database footer start