Kgoano Consulting and Projects Management CC and Another v Business Partners Limited (30127/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 319 (4 April 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPPHC 319 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Kgoano Consulting and Projects Management CC and Another v Business Partners Limited (30127/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 319 (4 April 2024) Kgoano Consulting and Projects Management CC and Another v Business Partners Limited (30127/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 319 (4 April 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_319.html sino date 4 April 2024 # IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA # (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) # CASE NUMBER: 30127/2021 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGE: NO (3) REVISED: NO DATE: 4 April 2024 SIGNATURE In the matter between: # KGOANO CONSULTING & PROJECTS KGOANO CONSULTING & PROJECTS MANAGEMENT CC First Applicant MMATSHEKO KATE MOREKHURE Second Applicant and BUISNESS PARTNERS LIMITED Respondent Heard: 26 March 2024 Delivered: This reasons for judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and uploaded on case lines. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 14h00 on 4 April 2024. # REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT REASONS FOR JUDGEMENT LE GRANGE AJ: [1] This Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal ex tempore with costs on 26 March 2024. [2] On 2 April 2024 a request was made for reasons, which is provided herewith as follows: [3] After due consideration of the application for condonation and considering that the application (and the facts surrounding the application) is not vehemently opposed, this Court found it to be in the interest of justice to grant condonation. Due to the applicant seeking an indulgence, this Court made an order that costs be paid by it. [4] After due consideration of the application for leave to appeal and the grounds and basis thereof this Court found that there are no new or novel points raised which was not already raised in the application for recission. [5] This Court has extensively dealt with, and provided reasons for, each and every point raised, in its judgement that was delivered on 15 June 2023 and persist therewith, as if specifically dealt with herein. [6] Considering the above this Court is of the view that an appeal would have no reasonable prospect of success on these points, nor are there compelling reasons why an appeal should be heard. [7] Considering the fact that the scale of costs has been agreed upon this Court granted costs accordingly. [8] In the result the following order was made: 1. The application for condonation is granted, the applicant to pay the costs thereof. 2. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs on an attorney-and-client scale. # AJ LE GRANGE AJ LE GRANGE ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA APPEARANCES For the applicant: Adv Maake on the instruction of Malale Nthapeleng Attorneys. For the respondent: Adv C.L Marram-Jooste on instruction of SBM Attorneys. sino noindex make_database footer start