Case Law[2023] ZAGPPHC 486South Africa
Robert v Road Accident Fund [2023] ZAGPPHC 486; 80152/2018 (14 June 2023)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
14 June 2023
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPPHC 486
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Robert v Road Accident Fund [2023] ZAGPPHC 486; 80152/2018 (14 June 2023)
Robert v Road Accident Fund [2023] ZAGPPHC 486; 80152/2018 (14 June 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2023_486.html
sino date 14 June 2023
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA
CASE
NO: 80152/2018
(1)
REPORTABLE: NO
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)
REVISED.
DATE:
14 June 2023
SIGNATURE:
M Pienaar
In
the matter between:
TSHEPISO
VANESSA ROBERT
PLAINTIFF
and
ROAD
ACCIDENT FUND
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
PIENAAR
(AJ)
INTRODUCTION
[1]
This is an application for default judgment in an action instituted
against the Road
Accident Fund, the Defendant as the body that is, in
terms of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56 of 1996 (“the Act”)
responsible
for any loss suffered as a result of the negligent
driving of motor vehicles, for damages for personal injuries the
Plaintiff sustained
in a motor vehicle collision that occurred on 29
December 2017 at N3 North direction before Grey Avenue off ramp.
[2]
At the time of the accident the Plaintiff was a passenger in the
Insured motor vehicle.
She blamed the negligent driving of the
Insured driver for the accident and, consequently, sued the RAF for
damages she suffered
of the amount of R4 060 000,00
[3]
The Defendant entered an appearance to defend and filed a plea, but
at some stage
the attorneys of record for the Defendant withdrew and
no attorneys were appointed. On 27 October 2021 before the Honorable
Justice
Manyathi (AJ) the Defendant’s defence was struck off.
It is on that basis that the Plaintiff proceed with an application
for default judgment.
[4]
The matter came before me on 29 March 2023. Mr Mojamabu appeared for
the Plaintiff.
Ms Mokaumbe appeared for the Defendant. I requested
that the matter stands down until 31st March 2023, for the Plaintiff
to testify.
[5]
On 31st March 2023 both Mr Mojamabu and Ms Mokaumbe appeared in
Court. I informed
Ms Mokaumbe that the Defendant’s defense was
struck off, which means the Defendant cannot be part of the hearing.
[6]
The Plaintiff applied for separation of the merits and the quantum of
the Plaintiff’s
damages. Therefore, the matter proceed on the
issue of merits of the claim only.
[7]
The Plaintiff’s case is on or about 29 December 2017, at N3
North an accident
occurred involving a motor vehicle with
registration numbers and letters M[...] (hereinafter referred as
insured driver motor vehicle)
driven by Thambi Mokhethi (hereinafter
referred to as insured driver), who lost control of the insured motor
vehicle and crashed.
[8]
For sake of completeness the following documents are uploaded onto
Caselines as exhibits
for the trial, namely:
8.1
Plaintiff’s notice in terms of Rule 35(9) - Inquest report as
Exhibit A
8.2
Plaintiff’s lodgment documents as Exhibit B
8.3
Plaintiff’s pleading documents as Exhibit C
8.4
Plaintiff application to compel and strike out as Exhibit D
EVIDENCE
ON THE MERITS
[9]
In the Plaintiff’s particulars of claims that on 29 December
2017 at N3 North
an accident occurred involving a motor vehicle with
registration numbers and letters M[...] 7[...] driven by Thambi
Mokhethi who
lost control of the insured motor vehicle and crashed.
At the time of the accident the Plaintiff was a passenger in the
insured
motor vehicle. The Plaintiff claims that the collision was
caused by the negligence of the insured driver because of the
following
reasons:
a)
He failed to keep a proper lookout;
b)
He drove at a speed that was excessive having regarded to the
circumstances prevailing
at the time of the collision;
c)
He failed to apply the brakes of his respective motor vehicles
timeously or at
all, at a stage and/or time when he could and/or
should have done so;
d)
He failed to avoid a collision by exercising reasonable care he could
and should
have done so.
[10]
The Plaintiff, Tshepiso Vanessa Roberts took the witness’ stand
and testified under oath.
There was also an Interpreter to assist the
Plaintiff with the language. Ms Robert testified that on 29 December
2017 the accident
occurred at the N3 North off ramp, and at the time
of the accident the driver was Thambi Mokhethi. She was sitting on
the left
front seat, seated as a passenger. Mr Mokheti (the driver)
and herself were lovers at that time. The mood between the Mr Mokheti
and Ms Roberts was impetuous at the time of the accident. During the
trip the driver slapped her with an open hand. Ms Robert kept
silent.
The driver decided to stop in the yellow line, but the vehicle was
still stationery. Mr Mokhethi attacked her while the
vehicle was
stationery. Ms Robert try to escape, and moved over to the drivers
seat. Ms Robert doesn’t have license. An accident
occurred and
Mr Mokhethi died as result of the accident.
[11]
Mr Mojamabu referred me to the Police docket which is also before the
Court.
[12]
On 18 March 2018, under case number 541/12/2017 wherein the Plaintiff
made a statement. She confirmed
that she immediately jumped to the
driver's seat and Mr Mokhethi got into the front passenger side. She
pulled the automatic handle
down and the vehicle started to reverse
backwards. It was then when a truck hit the black Volkswagen motor
vehicle from the back.
[13]
On 29 December 2017, Lucas Erolly Phetla who reported to be employed
by Ekurhuleni Metro Police
Department as a Metro Police Officer made
a statement and confirmed that he attended a scene on the date and
place as indicated
by the Plaintiff in her particulars. He confirmed
that he found it was driven by an unknown black female and she
sustained serious
injuries and was taken to Baragwanath Hospital. She
had a black male passenger and he passed away on the scene.
[14]
Considering all the facts placed before me, I find that the Plaintiff
was the driver at the time
of the accident.
[15]
On the facts I am not persuaded that the Plaintiff was a passenger at
the time of the accident
as indicated in her particulars of Claim.
[16]
The evidence in the form of the witness testified, police statement
from the Plaintiff and Constable
Lucas Erolly Phetla who visited the
scene directly after the accident correspond to the relating
statements.
[17]
In the result I make the following order:
17.1
The Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.
17.2
No order as to costs
MPIENAAR
M
PIENAAR (AJ)
Acting
Judge of the High Court
Gauteng
Division, Pretoria
Heard
on
: 31st March 2023
Judgement
date : 14 June 2023
Appearance on
behalf of the Plaintiff :
Adv Mojamabu
sammojamabu@yahoo.com
Instructed by:
R S Tau Attorneys
ndweleni@rstauatorneys.co.za
Appearance on
behalf of the Defendant:
State Attorney
Ms Mokaumbe
Defence has been
struck out
Link no: 4418496
[1]
Caselines 008 : bundle 4 Trial Bundles pg 008-145
[2]
Caselines 014 : bundle 9 Notice of Set down pg 014-672
[3]
Caselines 012 : bundle 4 Court Order
[4]
Caselines 024 : Police docket
[5]
Caselines 024 : Notice in terms of rule 35(9) death certificate, pg
024-23
[6]
Caselines 024: Notice in terms of Rule 35(9) Statement of Tshepo
Robert pg 024-41
[7]
Caselines 024: Notice in terms of Rule 35(9) Statement of Locus
Erolly Phetla, pg
024-52
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Zondi v Road Accident Fund (A63/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1823 (18 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 1823High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
S.M.K v Road Accident Fund (48025/2016) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1006 (29 November 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 1006High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
R.S.M v Road Accident Fund (A137/2018) [2023] ZAGPPHC 641 (31 July 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 641High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Mthisi v Road Accident Fund (2023/115885) [2025] ZAGPPHC 402 (8 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 402High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
T.T.M v Road Accident Fund (39038/2017) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1254 (2 December 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1254High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar