Sassman and Another v Pienaar and Another (Leave to Appeal) (25559/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1846 (2 November 2023)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPPHC 1846 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Sassman and Another v Pienaar and Another (Leave to Appeal) (25559/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1846 (2 November 2023) Sassman and Another v Pienaar and Another (Leave to Appeal) (25559/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1846 (2 November 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2023_1846.html sino date 2 November 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case Number:  25559/2022 (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES / NO. (3) REVISED. DATE: 2/11/2023 SIGNATURE In the matter between: NATHAN EDWIN SASSMAN First Applicant DESIREE ELIZABETH SASSMAN Second Applicant And HARRISON HURSINEY PIENAAR First Respondent HEIDI JULIA PIENAAR Second Respondent This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the Parties/their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines.  The date for handing down is deemed to be    November 2023. JUDGMENT:  APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL POTTERILL J [1]        I have studied the grounds of appeal, read the applicants’ and respondents’ heads of argument and listened to oral argument as to why leave to appeal must be granted or not. [2]        My judgment fully addresses the points raised and I am satisfied no other court could reasonably come to another conclusion. [3]        The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. S. POTTERILL JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT CASE NO: 25559/2022 DATE OF HEARING: 31 October 2023 FOR THE APPLICANTS: ADV. M. KUFA INSTRUCTED BY: Machaba Attorneys FOR THE RESPONDENTS: ADV. M. JACOBS INSTRUCTED BY: Klagsbruin Edelstein Bosman Du Plessis Inc. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 2 November 2023 sino noindex make_database footer start